US considered a special status for Greenland Amid Trump Push for Control American foreign policy star-news.press/wp

U.S. officials are discussing Greenland withdraw to the American sphere of influence using the type of agreement that the United States used that close relationships with several US officials and other people met discussions.

Under consideration of the plan, the Trump Administration would propose Greenland leaders to enter the island to the so-called compact association or cofa, with the United States.

Although the precise details of the COFA agreement – which have ever extended to small islands of Micronesia, the Marshal Islands and Palau – vary depending on the signatories, the US government usually provides many relevant services to the emergency service to military protection. In exchange, the US military operates freely in COFA countries, and trade with the United States is generally without duty.

Donald Trump, who floated the idea of ​​acquiring Greenland during his first administration, was still harder for himself to take on the January, refusing to turn off to exclude his island by force. Denmark, which rules the island, precisely specified the idea.

COFA agreement would stop being Trump’s ambition that the island of 57,000 people seem to part of the US. It is not the only Greenland plan on the table, the sources said and faces many practical obstacles.

Some officials in the National Security Council and the National Council for the Domination of Energy, established by Trump, are included in the talks, two sources said. The National Economic Council is also included, one of these sources added.

COFA agreements were previously placed with independent countries, and Greenland should probably be detached from Denmark for such a plan to continue. While surveys show Greenlanders are interested in independence, surveys also show that they want to be part of the United States most. COFA – which has been separated by significant autonomy in Washington – could be viewed with a similar skeptic.

One of those involved in discussions is Markus Thoma, the actor of higher directories for the Vedra Western Hemisphere of national security, according to two sources. David Copley, the key mining officer on the NEDC, is also involved in conversations, said one of those sources.

The White House did not respond to the request for the comment, nor did the representative offices of the Danish Embassy or Greenland in Washington.

The internal department playing a key role in the management of COFA agreements through its Office of Zasular Jobs has also not answered.

Existing agreements on Cofa Washington with Palau, Marshall Islands and Microneses were seen in American political spectrum as important to combat the growing influence of China in the Asian Pacific region.

However, such agreements hit Snagova in the past.

Republic legislators are occasionally opposed to the budget elements assigned to fund the COFA Agreement, creating deep frustrations in the resources that rely on funds.
The signing of Cofa also does not offer a guarantee that the nation will be immune from the operations of the impact of American rivals.

Danish leaders did not access ideas and did not have significant discussions with white house on the future status of Greenland, said one senior European official. Danish officials publicly rejected the idea of ​​the US acquiring Greenland, and insists insist in Greenlanders must determine their future.

Administration officials claim that the island is key to the United States for its deposits of minerals who have important Hi-Tech and military applications, but which remain unused due to shortages, scarce infrastructure and various other challenges.

The Management Board told Reuters, the United States, Greenland diversified its economy and acquire greater economic independence from Denmark. The corporation for the development and export-import bank could play a role in the process, the official said.

The official said that Cofa “could be an elegant way to address some concerns that we have when it comes to Greenland Security,” but did not comment differently in such an agreement.

2025-05-09 18:48:00

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *