Trump speech makes concerns about the politicization of military star-news.press/wp

Washington – Defense Officers say the troops were cheering and stated on Tuesday in the Political Statements of the President Donald Trump in the rally in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, but the former military legal officer said they had just done.

During the speech, uniformed soldiers shouted in supporting Trump’s political statements and muffled by the former President Joe Biden and the California Government Gavin.

“Do you think that bunch would appear for Biden? I don’t think so,” Trump Boosu about Biden said.

Trump has made other comments on News and Karen Bas, the Mayor of Los Angeles, where protests were against the administration failure of immigrants and where Trump ordered thousands of National Guard and Active Marines who were arranged in response. Other trump comments about “false journalistic media”, transgender people, the protesters in California and California-flags also drew boos from uniformed military members.

Trump is known for its gatherings where it goes after that and affects the entertainment on political enemies and other issues, but it typically makes these notes on political events, not to US military bases.

Such open political activities on the basis is a prerogative commander of the Chief Commander. But the military leaders would usually frown on the troops, reacting the way they did as inconsistent with military in good order and discipline, and, according to one expert, a violation of the military laws in the united laws of military justice or UCMJ.

Presidents of both parties often use troops as political props and their commanders in severe positions work, but Trump speech took this to a new level, said Geoffrey Deweeese General who is now a lawyer with Brand S. ZAID PC. (Zaid represented whistleblowers on both sides of the passage, including the appeal of Trump’s invitation with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in 2019. year that led to Trump whose secured issues of Trump revoked this year.)

“It is a sad tradition for the use of the army as a background for political purposes,” Dewees said. “To actively attack another president or sitting governor and encourage a crowd on Boo, it is a step in a dangerous direction, which really says we want to politicize the army, which sends a bad message.”

Deweese said that it was likely to be a violation of UCMJ.

“I would be crooked that I was a taller officer, and that happened under his hours,” he said.

The Secretary of the Defense of Pete Hegset was repeatedly wanted to take over the military policy by removing the diversity, capital and inclusions and prohibition services by tourist members of transgender services.

SCHAKE, older associate in the US Enterprise Institute, who worked in the State Department and the National Security Council in the former president George W. Bush and in the e-mail, in the empire in Fort Bragg.

“It’s awful,” she wrote. “The president is predictable misbehavioration for the attempt to achieve political points, and it is an order for the failure of the leader in FT Bragg not to prepare soldiers for that bad behavior and advises not to participate.”

The Pentagon said in the statement that there was no violation of UCMJ and suggested that the media was against the policies that Trump Champiolovio.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also stated that the media “cheered the queen of the war on the military basis, promoted the races on the Federal Laws and fired troops that refused the experimental vaccine. “

“Trust me, no one should be encouraged to boo medium,” Parnell said. “Don’t look any further than this query, which is nothing but an embarrassing attempt to destroy the life of young soldiers.”

On Wednesday, the Army officials in Fort Bragga addressed the sale of some magical goods on the event, which is planned in cooperation with the non-partrassical organization, American 250.

“The army remains committed to its basic values ​​and apolitical services to the Nation,” said Colonel Mary Ricks, Spokesperson 18. Airborne Corps in Bragg, said in the statement. “The military does not support political goods or attitudes that represents. The presence of suppliers is reviewed to determine how it was permitted in the future to prevent similar circumstances.”

Own new field manual, published recently, says that the apolitical nature of American soldiers is what contributes to public trust.

The military “as an institution must be noticed and thus appearing,” says the new field manual “, the military: the basic coat of our weapon profession.”

“Being not a non-consisting not favoring any specific political parties or group. The non-parenting assures the public that our army will always serve the Constitution and our people loyal and responsible.”

American troops can participate in political functions, simply not on duty or in uniform, says the book.

“As a private citizen, you encourage you to participate in our democratic process, but as a soldier you must keep in mind how your actions can affect the reputation and perceived reliability of our army as an institution,” it says.