Ben & Jerry’s allegations was placed in the new Court of Political Positions star-news.press/wp

Ben & Jerry has not accused his company, this month to enforce himself, Ben and Jerry’s political activism on support, in a constant issue between companies.

The allegation was changed on Tuesday at the U.S. district court, in the Southern New York region. Ben & Jerry’s Initially presented the lawsuit of accused of Unilever in November Mute his public expressions with the help of Palestinian refugees is a constant war of Israel-Hamas.

According to the change of Ben & Jerry, David Stever’s Cea David fired on March 3rd-threatening employees “They have to fail when they do not comply with the efforts to silence the social role.”

The suit accuses that this was clearly placed in the most recent review of Stend.

Introduction Unilever chastilizes the Board for repeatedly “Ben & Jerry Ben and Jerry collaborated by the Independent Mail Committee.” The suit says.

Replacement of the way of working with the Council “is anticethatic for its contract duties,” the suit said.

NBC News came to Unilever, Ben & Jerry to comment on Wednesday. According to a letter submitted to the court, the motion to exclude Unilever is expected.

Ben & Jerry previously presented the parent company that Unilever said that he sold the company’s business with a local licensed Local in Israel. The bump of the ice cream brand, which announced the boycott of the regional sales, is protested by illegal settlements in Israel, in the busy western bank.

The suit has, as part of the settlement agreement of the 2022, UNILEVER agreed to Ben & Jerry’s “first responsibility” in its social and essential brand integrity. “

This agreement allegedly broken when Unilever against several times when Ben & Jerry put public statements.

The instance marked in the case is in May 2024, when the European Social Group of Unilever Ben & Jerry stopped, publish a statement to defend Palestinians outside the war.

The lawsuits, President of Peter Ter Kulve, wrote Ben and Jerry President Anuradha Mittal on July 1, 2024, had joined the Israeli attacks for the Israeli attacks.

“When the subject was scaled for me, I had a concern with the continued perception of anti-Semitism, a continuous issue,” said Ter Kulver’s messages, according to the suit.

The suit has said that Mittal disturbed “false equivalence” and Kulve asked whether he had data to protect his opinion: “Such market analysis or third party assessment”.

“To date, Mr. Ter Kelve has never given such evidence,” he says outfits.

Unilever believes that the donations allegedly blocked peace and the chapter of the American Relations Council of America.

After repeating the objections to be written, Umiliver sent a “gesture table” and entered the “neutral” conflict of Palestinian Israelis.

The court does not complain about complaining about the problem of compliance with the problem with an Israeli organization and giving other reasons. Complaints Unilever stated with the help of Ukrainians in the country of Russia and members of the Unilever Council after the public support of Donald Trump.

Ben & Jerry believes that Unilever interference is not only violated by the settlement of 2022, but also affected its brand in decades of social and political activism.

“Ben and Jerry’s customers hope to comment on pressing social issues and because of the official classification officials, because of the solidarity of these causes,” the suit says.