According to the Tiktok policy on X, the allegations that its Chinese owners are increasing by $ 300 million from the official Memecoin Trump (Trump) is wrong.
The post called the idea “clearly false and irresponsible.” He even indicated that claim He did not match the speech of Representative Brad Sherman, which signed last month.
Delaying Exec excites eyebrows
US President Donald Trump signed him The third executive order In this spring, he paid a prohibition or forced sale of Tiktok for another 90 days. This step gave Tiktok for nearly three other months to find the buyer or face an explicit ban in the United States.
Many people wondered whether the political influence of Tactok is part of the adherence. Some looked at Sherman’s timing that there is no accident – he spoke after announcing the third delay.
A member of Congress, claiming that Tiktok owners buy “Trump currencies” clearly and irresponsible and does not accurately reflect a message that it signed last month.
Tiktok (tiktokpolike) policy June 19, 2025
US Rep. Brad Sherman. Source: Allison Robbert/The Hill
GD Culture Group Connection begins doubts
Based on reports on the SEC file, the GD Culture Group – a small company listed in Nasdak without any known relationships with BYDTEDANCE – has purchased up to $ 300 million in Trump Mimikoen and Bitcoin.
GD culture creates paid videos in Amnesty International TikhakBut it does not own it by atteedance and does not have the joint board members. This bonding mix and materials began a wave of confusion, which led some to assume that Tiktok itself was funding the purchase of memecoin.
Sherman Criticism is encrypted
According to Sherman, “Trump creates”Trump currencies“Without any cost, and this means that this is just a bribe of $ 300 million goes directly to his pocket.”
Sherman has long argued a comprehensive coding ban.
In 2019, he warned that cryptocurrencies could replace the US dollar. Mix his recent comments from his concern about the Chinese Tiktok ownership with his deep lack of confidence in the encryption world.
Online reaction divides the audience
Some online users questioned the denial of Tiktok, wondering whether the effect of China is deeper than we know. Others accumulated on Sherman, and criticized his anti -Rabat stance until his call to Tijok.
One commentator wrote, “No one wants to ban Tijook, except for the Israeli lobby, also known as your dolls,” adding fuel to the fire.
Politics, encryption and social media tangle
In less than a week, one form of a second and a tweet in Congress turned into a complete scene:
On one side, we have a social platform fighting to stay in the United States market.
On the other hand, the legislator warns of foreign influence and digital money.
Distinctive image from Unsplash, tradingvief chart

Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.
https://bitcoinist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/a_a365bd.jpg
2025-06-21 04:00:00