Washington – The Supreme Court Wednesday is considering a new legal issue whether the woman can continue in the case of discrimination in the workplace for receivables, was discriminated against because he is straight.
The ultimate court solution could record a bar for people who belong to majority groups to bring so-called receivables per reverse discrimination.
Marlean Ames brought a request against Ohio Department for young people in accordance with the title of VII of the Law on Civil Rights, which prohibits sexual discrimination in the workplace, after the lesbian woman received the promotion she also asked for. Then she was demodiated, and her old position took over a gay man.
Ames worked in the 2004 department. Years. Starting in 2017. years, she began to apply for a lesbian woman. She denied the promotion she asked for two years later and was demoted soon after.
Lower courts, including Cincinnati based on 6. The US Appellate Court, ruled for the State Agency. Ames then turned to the Supreme Court.
Her lawyers are a challenging precedent in some lower courts that writes that someone from the “majority group” must meet more bar in the case of moving forward from someone from a minority group.
These courts, including the sixth round, say that such a prosecutor must present “background circumstances” to show that the accused is an indictment who discriminates most, “he said in court newspapers.
If the Court rules in Asmovs could affect discrimination requirements in the workplace of all kinds. For example, this could facilitate white people who claim to face racial discrimination as a result of diversity, capital and inclusion, or dei, politics.
Since President Donald Trump took over the position, his administration aimed at the DEI, saying they were illegal.
America The first legal, conservative group with the close links of Trump administration, filed that amazor cases that have led against various companies, including Starbucks and IBM, alleged race and sex discrimination.
“There was applied, the rule of” background circumstances “is the onadness, unconstitutional and arbitrary obstacle to the disposal of the NGO employees,” Group Lawyers wrote.
Before President Joe Biden left the office, his administration filed his own short in saying to test the “background circumstances” test.
General Prosecutorial Attorney Dave Yost, Republican, claimed in a court newspaper that Ames did not show that he was discriminated against.
Ames was demonized because the new management in the agency wanted to restructure their business to prioritize sexual violence in the juvenile system, Yost said. Ames led a program that was aimed at fighting rape in prison, but he was seen that it was hard to work, he said Yost.
Officials involved in the adoption of these decisions are flat, they were recorded.
2025-02-26 10:00:00
