It seems that the Supreme Court directs the Ohio woman right because he is right star-news.press/wp

Washington (AP) – The Supreme Court It seems likely that the party with a woman in Ohio is likely to claim that he had undergone his employer’s sex discrimination. Because it is correct.

The result of the case may require some requirements for a majority requirements that members of a group, whites and heterosexuals are sued for discrimination according to the federal lawsuit.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh He expressed a way to resolve the case, seemingly enjoyed a wide support among his colleagues.

“Discourse Based on sexual orientation, it is forbidden or straightforward. The rules are the same as the direction,” Kavanaugh said.

Justice hear the arguments in Marlean Ames’s attractiveness, who has worked in the Department of Ohio’s youth services over 20 years.

Ames passed it for a promotion and then because it’s heterosexual. He searched for his job and that he held it to LGBTQ.

VII Title 1964 bar discrimination in the workplace. Trial Court and 6 US Circuit Circuit. Circuit ruled against Ames.

The question of justice is based on Cincinnati 6. Circuits and many other national courts in the District of District, when members of a majority team make discrimination claims. Reporting workplace biases should be shown “background situations”, people in LGBTQ, decisions caused by ames or statistical evidence that show a discrimination model against majority group members.

The Appeal Court has noted that Ames does not give such situations.

Ohio Solicitor Main T. Elliot Geiser said officials who have made work decisions did not know the sexual orientation of Ames.

But even Geiser did not have too many objective to the narrow result. “Everyone here agrees that everyone should be treated alike,” geeis said.

His concession prompted justice Neil Gorsuch Please note, “We are currently in radical agreements.”

America archived the first laws and other conservative groups, members of majority groups will be able to address job discriminations, if so, due to diversity, equity and inclusion policies.

President Donald Trump He has ordered Finish call policies He wants to ask for government support at the federal government and elsewhere. There have been some anti-call initiatives against the administration temporarily blocked In the federal court.

American lawyers created by Trump aide Stephen MillerThe discrimination between the members of the team wrote is that the discrimination is very rare “is very suspicious at this recruitment age” based on diversity, equity and inclusion “.

But it wasn’t a mention on Wednesday justics.