The Supreme Court rejects the challenge of students “ban on T-shirts of two genders star-news.press/wp

Washington – The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to hear the Massachusetts Student’s challenge to their ban on high school, carrying a T-shirt “There are only two sexes”.

The case was created from the dispute of Liam Morrison students with Nichols with a high school in the middle snowuuju.

Morrison lawyers in the Alliance defended the freedom, a conservative Christian legal advocacy group, say students are “bombed” with messages promoting the opinion “that sex and gender is self-determined, unlimited and cannot be converted into biology.”

Morrison believes that the opinion is “false and harmful” and answered in March 2023. year when he was in the seventh grade carrying a T-shirt. Once he was told to remove him, he later wore another T-shirt that said “there are (censored) couplings.”

Morrison was not punished for wearing a T-shirt, although he was told that he could not wear them in teaching and sent home when he refused to remove first.

Two conservative members of the Court, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, is uncle from the decision not to hear the case.

“This case represents a matter of great importance for the youth of our people: can they counteract students because it expresses the view that schools or due to vague concern in the school atmosphere or students who find offensive speeches” Alito wrote.

The case asked questions about the scope of free speech rights in public school students in the first amendment, which was recognized in the sights of 1969. which found the students had the right to wear supreme tapes.

School administrators indicate a student code, which expands any “hate speech or image”, saying that they are just implementing these requirements to avoid disorders in school.

Morrison lawyers say that the limitations of the jerseys in speech are uncommon.

And the Federal Judicial Judicial Judicial Judicial Judicial Court of Justice in Boston, ruled in the basis for the appeal basis in favor of the school.

The Appeals Court concluded that on the basis of the 1969 school officials. “Passive and quietly expressed messages” can deceive other people even if the term in question does not target a particular student.

The Supreme Court is currently valid from Maryland for parents attempt to ensure that primary school children can be excluded from a LGBT book that could be read in class.