The Supreme Court maintains a pause on Trump offer to immediately ignite the Watchdog agency star-news.press/wp

Washington – The Supreme Court on Friday for now prevented President Donald Trump to shoot the agency’s head of the Agency in the First Legal Procedure of Achieving System on Administration Strengths to Drastly Remace the Federal Government.

In an unusual, trial move, the Court has not been approved nor did it deny an emergency application that has filed a trump administration after the lower courts blocked the effort to fire Hampton Dellinger, which is kept by the Special Defense Counsel.

Instead, In short, The court said that he would not immediately act because lower court proceedings moving quickly. The hearing is scheduled for March 26. February.

The Court, who said he was held by Trump’s request “in Abeyance”, could act after that.

Here you follow live policies

Two Surals, Liberals, and Ketanji Brown Jackson said he would denounce the application directly, while two conservatives of the Court – Justice Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito would be approved.

Gorsuch wrote that the Federal Judge “is effectively commanded by the President and other executive officials to recognize and work with someone who the president sought to get out of the office.”

Trump wants to install Doug Collins, Secretary of the Veteran Department, as an acting boss of the Agency.

The claim for an emergency claim is probably the first of the many such applications that the administration will take on the Supreme Court due to the lower court decisions that interfere with Trump’s aggressive and unseen Shakeupu Federal Agencies. The President, in the Alliance with a Billionaire Mosus, fired thousands of workers, sought to block federal spending and tried to dismantle the distribution agencies, including the American International Development Agency.

Wrapping the Supreme Court to intervene, the acting lawyer of Sarah Harris sent to Bujn temporary restricting orders issued by federal judges who at least temporarily blocked different trumps.

“This court should not allow the judiciary to manage a temporary limited order and give judicial responsibility, order the Constitution,” she wrote.

Harris also dealt with the recent statements of administrative officers, including JD Vance Vice President, who appeared to ask the question whether the White House is in accordance with Judicial Orders.

“The executive seriously understands its constitutional duty to adhere to the order of Article II of the Courts and it fulfilled that office here,” she wrote, referring to the Judicial Powers section.

The Office of Special Defenders deals with different issues related to federal employees, monitoring the protection of whistleblowers and implementing the restriction of political activity. The Office may bring executive actions and issue regulations; It has nothing to do with special advice that may appoint the Ministry of Justice to bring federal prosecutor’s offices.

Dellinger took office in March 2024. years after the former former president Joe Biden and confirmed the Senate.

Trump tried to remove him from the function on 7. February, encouraging Dellinger to bear his suit.

According to the Federal Law, the head of the Agency has a five-year term and can be released by the President “only for inefficiency, neglect of duty or abuse.”

But the Supreme Court earlier said that similar restrictions on the presidential power were unoccupied as they violate the basic constitutional powers of the President.

2020. The Court ruled on these grounds in the event that he involved the director of the Consumer Protection Bureau and followed that with a similar judgment a year later in relation to the Federal Housing Financi Agency.

The Federal Officer based in Washington betrayed 10. February, preventing Dellinger was removed as his case continued and later issued temporary restraints that hold for two weeks.

The Trump Administration complained about the US Appeals for the Colombia District, which refused to annul the verdict on the vote 2-1. Then the administration turned to the Supreme Court.

Correction (22. February 2025, 12.47 ET): The previous version of this Article was incorrectly identified by one of the conservative court courts to approve the request of the Trump Administration. It was Samuel Alito, not Clarence Thomas.