The Supreme Court listens to the Louisiana race Gerrymandering claim star-news.press/wp

Washington – The Supreme Court hears an unusual case. Civil rights teams do in a temptation alliance to defend a map of the Louisiana Congress. It first includes two black regions for the first time.

Justice took the appeal to the states to draw a map, left and directly in terms of racism.

The case has a complicated history, as a result of the original map of the legislator after 2020 census, he was just the black range of the six districts of the State. One-third of the state population is black.

The civil rights team, his legal defense funds, sued and ultimately won, arguing that most black regions of voting rights needed.

The “African American” group of “African American” groups led to Phillip Callais, which direct the latest maps currently in force.

A federal court fell down the new map, but the state successfully asked the Supreme Court to block the judgment last year, which is used in the November election. Rep. Cleo fields, d-la., ultimately won Drawn range.

Now, the Supreme Court will decide whether the map can be there or not, whether he weighs several legal questions, however, whether he sued.

The court could also go beyond and how much can voting rights activities.

Although state officials defend the new map, the courts must also say that the courts are “not justifiable”.

Louisiana Solicitor Benjamin Aguiñaga wrote today that the state is being sued, whatever millions of dollars spend in legal expenditure.

“No one wins this struggle – the state loses, the voters lose, the judiciary loses and loses democracy,” he wrote.

The challenges said the court paper that the new map is a “racial waist breed”. None of the rules of the state “14. Correction of a credible amendment,” they added.

Meanwhile the courts were originally asked for court teams, which is about political reflections on the states, Mike Johnson in Mike Johnson, Mike Johnson, Louisiana House.

The Supreme Court is a conservative majority of 6-3, a constitution “coloring” for conservative proclamations.

In an unexpected movement, the Judge 2023 confirmed the law of voting rights in another case of another Congressional caused by Alabama.