The brain circuit model reveals the extent of the formation of daily decisions star-news.press/wp

summary: The researchers have developed an accounting framework for how the abyss cabin governs the plan to make daily decisions. By integrating biology, decision theory and sporting modeling, the study reveals that different levels of basic activity can push individuals towards flowing, balanced or excessively complex decisions.

Higher activity enhances fast -focused options, while low activity pays slow decisions and analysis. The results provide a new lens to understand weak decisions in mental disorders and indicate the amendment of the basic activity as a possible treatment strategy.

Main facts:

  • Activity spectrum: The levels of the abyss are determined whether the decisions are simple, flowing, complex or late.
  • Psychological link: The abnormal funiosomal function may be to issues in making decisions in post -trauma disorder and drug use and depression.
  • Therapeutic capabilities: The basic activity can be a new treatment approach to psychological states.

source: Mount Sinai Hospital

Scientists from the ICAHN College of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who work in cooperation with a team from the University of Texas at El Paso, have developed a new arithmetic framework to understand how an area of the brain known as the scheme in the daily decisions we make and disorder disorder in any post -increasing disorder.

In a study published in Nature Communications On August 14, the team informed that modifying the activity within the stroke cabin-a separate nervous field of the plan-may be an important treatment strategy to enhance health decisions in people with mental disorders.

However, very high levels of basic activity can lead to impulsive decisions that are made quickly and often. Credit: Neuroscience News

“Although it has been proven that the scheme is clearly important to make decisions in terms of cost, the exact role of the strategic stroke has remained out of reach.”

“Our arithmetic model deals with this issue by creating a framework that links the basic activity levels that and the number of factors that we take in our decisions to follow up something. For the first time, we have developed a model to explain the extent of vascular departments in making health decisions and turmoil.”

It is known that the scheme plays a decisive role in the human brain by coordinating multiple aspects of perception, including decision -making, control of movements, motivation, and perceptions.

Distinguishing them in the anatomically separate compartments of the stroters and matrix, although the functional effects of the Striposum Organization Organization are not poorly understood.

By creating and publishing an advanced model that combines biology, decision -making theory, sports modeling, and analyzing huge data, the team throws the values of discrimination in regulating the nervous function in each of these compartments.

The researchers have found that information from the brain about the potential relevant factors that involve decisions flow to the steriorans, and that government jackets and then specify any of these factors that will be used to make the decision.

Specifically, they learned that high levels of basic activity prefer “simple” decisions in which individual factors are determined whether the individual is following an option that carries possible rewards or costs.

However, very high levels of basic activity can lead to impulsive decisions that are made quickly and often.

On the other hand, the study revealed that the low levels of basic activity prefer “complex” decisions in which multiple factors are considered in the context of decision -making, while very low levels can lead to “paralysis in the analysis”, where the decisions are greatly delayed because many factors are considered and neurological circuits can stability in the formation crawling on one other procedure.

“Our model provides an innovative way to explain the weakness in the so -called cost decision -making in psychological disorders,” explains Alexander Friedman, Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences at the University of Texas at El Passo and the author of the joint study on the study.

“For example, we believe that disorders such as PTSD and drug abuse, in which risky behaviors are common, are common, caused by high levels of basic activity that drives possible rewards but ignoring possible costs.

“On the contrary, it is believed that disorders are believed, such as depression, where daily decisions are difficult, resulting from low levels of basic activity that leads to consideration of many dimensions.”

The arithmetic tool does not provide Dr. Ghusanz and the team a framework to explain the reason for the poor daily decision -making in mental disorders, but highlights the need to understand how to change the amateur activity in various disorders.

Perhaps more dependent is the team’s suggestion that modifying the basic activity through therapeutic intervention can be a new and effective approach to treat a wide range of psychological distortions.

The study was a cooperative effort related to the Friedman Institute of Brain, the Center for Translation Medicine and Pharmacy, and the psychological and pharmaceutical science departments in Mount Sinai and the University of Texas at El Passo.

About this news of this nervous science research

author: Elizabeth Deling
source: Mount Sinai Hospital
communication: Elizabeth Deling – Jabal Sinai Hospital
image: The image is attributed to news of neuroscience

The original search: Open access.
The decision -making model explains to make specific decisions for the contextWritten by Ki Guzins and others. Nature Communications


a summary

The decision -making model explains to make specific decisions for the context

The optimal decision -making requires considering internal and external contexts. Displayed decisions are a diagnostic symptom of psychological nervous disorders.

We have created an accounting model that shows how the striosome compartment of the plan is creating a sporty space based on the context of decision -making accounts, and how the matrix cabin uses this space to determine the value of the procedure.

The model explains multiple experimental results and unifying other theories such as a reward prediction error, direct track roles versus indirect, and Striosome roles versus the matrix, under one framework.

We also found, through new analyzes, that sterioceom and matrix neurons increase their coincidence during the difficult tasks, which are caused by a necessary increase in the dimensions of space.

The model makes test predictions about individual differences in the ability to disorder, symptoms of decision -making common to mental nervous disorders, and differences in symptoms of mental nervous disorder.

The model provides evidence of the central role plays in the taking of nervous economic decisions and turmoil.

2025-08-14 20:22:00

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *