The participation of the weekend on X from the official Solana account ignited a new round of cross sniping after it collected the speed of the ETHEREUM network with the NASDAQ trade productivity. “When they say that the future of the markets extends to 22 TPS, but Nasdaq deals with 2K deals per second,” Solana wrote, as it implicitly Layer-1 as the best with modern market plumbing.
Ethereum users fill out, on the pretext that the comparison was an open Blockchain error, without permission and a closed central exchange network. The most fatty came from the Polynya (Apolynya), which has 94,000 followers on X.
When they say that the future of the markets works at 22 TPS, but Nasdaq takes 2K deals per second pic.twitter.com/tasgacfc7k
Solana August 9, 2025
Solana Ethereum
In a joint mailPolynya has argued that the technical foundation lines behind American stocks dwarm the infrastructure of shares that a decentralized layer can achieve to the minimum global consensus. “SIP is designed from Nasdaq to deal with 10 million operations per second, with a time of 0.02 milliseconds (although realistic, quickly restricted, is still up to 0.2 mm between NYSE or CBOE and NASDAQ), and can be easily parallel to Infinite productivity.
From that hypothesis, the conclusion was explicit: “Given the restrictions broken in achieving a strict global consensus, Nasdak will forever be thousands of times faster and cheaper than any decentralized L1 Blukan, which is less than the strange new physics that exists yet.”
Polynya added that if Blockchains want to approach the markets in actual time, you should rely on brief encryption instead of raw TPS. “The only known way to approach anywhere is to use ZK evidence instead to implement in the actual time, postpone it and accelerate its strict global consensus according to the size of the size (where you just need to achieve consensus on a brief guide instead of millions of transactions), and even that, it will require that it take more than any case.”
This position ended in condemning the same scale: “The cryptocurrency is still completely dealing with” TPS “like 2017 instead of building applications that make people’s lives better. (Gambling has not been decomposed.)
Solana Labs Anatoly Yakovenko (aeyakovenko) retracted both framing and coding. He first claimed that “ZK evidence is always slower than classic implementation.” Expanding this, Yakovenko argued that comparison similar to stocks-if it is scheduled to be made-should be around withdrawal and scheduling guarantees instead of preventing TPS or collective cumin.
“NASDAQ requires the inclusion of each message, and that all messages are treated as it is.” He wrote, before it indicates how to change the priority fees on the listing on Blockchains: MicroseConds.
From an economic perspective, Yakovenko suggested that the design of Solana is already paying the cost of marginal declines towards non -connection. “If the ground priority fees are
The wrong belief about ZK evidence
He later returned to the ZK discussion to confirm where the proofs do and do not help. “I don’t understand where people get this wrong belief that ZK’s evidence is faster or can make a system faster in one way or another. It’s completely wrong. They can reduce some similar costs, but they cannot improve performance if the cost of the symmetrical copies is not objectionable.”
Yakovenko explained the point that has a frequency range thinking experience: “Let’s assume the ZK guides are completely free and a moment. If its size (TX) is
The ETHEREUM cost model that targets the bottom line: “So the only place in which ZK evidence actually helps is if the symmetrical copies are expensive. The symmetry is madly expensive?
The Solana Community developer, Joao Mindona (@joamendoncaaa) argued that Solana’s ambition is not equal to the raw raw speed of Nasdak. “The Solana Point as a substitute for Nasdak should not be at the speed of NASDAQ itself,” he wrote, but to provide similar implementation rates “with 1000x access, all over the world, (without) the permission request, 24/7, with the ownership of unknown assets and archives all over Defi.”
At the time of the press, Sol was traded at $ 174.34.
Distinctive image created with Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com
Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.
https://bitcoinist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ChatGPT-Image-Aug-12-2025-07_52_25-AM.png
2025-08-12 12:00:00
