Snap Benefits are facing a ban on a particular food under the new account star-news.press/wp

Paraitter in Texas push the account that would prevent people from using an additional food program (SNAP) benefits on food products that are considered unhealthy, such as sweet drinks, snacks and certain processed products.

The currently program does not allow people to use federal benefits for the purchase of tobacco products, alcohol and prepared meals.

Why is it important

More than 41 million Americans relies on the scissors, which makes it the largest product for assistance in the country. It provides monthly food for low and income families, strengthening their budget for groceries so that they can afford healthy and nutritious food.

Some argued that the Šnamp add to buy sweet snacks, soda and junk foods using benefits that promote unhealthy eating habits, which can lead to obesity and other related health problems.

Changes in what recipients may affect households throughout lonely stars, including healthy options are harder to come, because areas in which residents have limited access to accessible, nutrient foods such as fruit, vegetables and whole cereals.

What to know

Under Terms of Texas, the recipients of Snap could not use the benefits of the purchase of certain energy drinks, sweetened drinks (with additional sugars or sweeteners), caramers or corn chips or cookies.

“It’s common sense,” said State Senator Middleton, proposed by Bill, he said Newsweek. “According to the USD, 20 percent of expenditures for home households on sweeter drinks, desserts, salty snacks and sweets. Significantly, sweetened drinks itself accounted for 9.3 percent of these expenditures.”

Texas Republican referred to the U.S. Department of Agriculture for 2016. year analyzed the data on the sales transaction in 2011. years. The occupants of Snap households have been shown to be quite similar to those who are not-oriented households, with both groups that allocated comparable proportions of their food budgets in these categories. Something under 19 percent of non-purpose household costs went to categories Middleton mentioned Newsweek.

“This account is not about limiting individual purchasing power, but rather ensuring that food-funded food stamps are used to buy nutritious foods and prosperity,” Middleton said.

This is not the first time that legislators have proposed restrictions in which billing dollars can buy. Ten American states, all Republican LEDs, are currently considering the ban on the recipient from the purchase of junk food. And in the congress are two puppies in leadership that would remove carbonated drinks and other sweet products from SNAP.

Those who support such legislation say that restricting access to certain products could reduce obesity and nutritional health issues among low-income Americans.

According to statistics, 2021. years, the United States recorded about 56 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants who are attributed to obesity. Given the American population of about 332 million in 2021, that rate is stated about 186,000 deaths in connection with Gojaz that year.

The crisis of obesity in the USA was also added to economic problems in the country, because the medical costs of obesity tend to be higher than those for people without obesity – Forbes has reported more than 30 percent more than 30 percent.

As the taxpayer mainly funded medical care for those of Medicaid, supporters of legislation can also see adjustments to the Snap program to promote healthier nutrition as a positive economic outcome.

However, opponents of the Law warn of politics can burden families that rely on Snap to meet basic nutritional needs, which is often healthy food more expensive and lower in calories than unhealthy foods.

Study from August 2024. years plushcare found that unhealthy foods cheaper to buy healthy food in all 50 US countries, with differences ranging from about 2.9 percent, to 3.7 percent.

Critics also be careful that the definitions of “unhealthy” or “unhealthy” foods could be inconsistent to apply throughout the countries, and to make a small income incentive for fresh fruits and vegetables be a more efficient way to improve the diet.

In addition to legislative proposals, Trump Administration officials expressed an interest in reviewing the purchase recording guidelines. The Secretary of the Agriculture Brooke Rollins stated plans to cooperate with the cooperation between Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. To investigate the restricting of members to buy sweet drinks and junk food.

What do people say

Texas State Senator Mayese Middleton said: “Junk food does not even meet the purpose of a snap program that is food and health. Funded with a tax liability converts to the taxpayer financed by health care.”

Lauren au, associate professor in the Deal Department for California University, Davis, said Newsweek: “I don’t think there will be a significant nutritional impact that people are used from buying junk foods, and the most important ones increase the administrative costs of programs and retailers, and most likely to stigma for people who use the quality of the Americans’ diet.”

Kavelle Christie, Health Policy and Advocacy Expert, Previously Newsweek: “These suggestions may look attractive, who would not want to promote healthier eating habits? However, questioning them into effect, not to intend individuals, not to order the diet.

What happens next

The Draft Law on State Senate Texas discussed Monday and will have to pass the upper chamber before potentially advancing into the house floor.

The bill should need a federal approval before conducting, and if successfully obtained approval would become in force 1. September this year.