The timeline, the transformation points and the final referee star-news.press/wp

Ripple vs. SEC is one of the largest and most intense battles in the history of the encryption market, making investors, organizers and service providers on the edge of their seats. Starting with the Saddam of the Ripple Court Hall on the work of Ripple and the credibility of the encryption industry, this XRP lawsuit caused great damage, but this is no longer relevant. Let’s discuss.
What is the CAC case for SEC?
The Ripple VS SEC lawsuit is the legal battle between the prominent technology company, Ripple, American organizers, SEC. It is one of the most viewed legal battles and ran in a four -year course, and the formation of digital assets. More importantly, it greatly affected the price of XRP, as it decreased to $ 0.5, but the same is equal to $ 3.33 with the case ended.
SEC and Ripple’s legal battle finally ended.
The madness of respect to all of you who took care of this case the long donkey.
𝗙𝗨𝗡 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧: If you are held $ Xrp Through the entire case, it will be more than 1700 %. pic.twitter.com/juhwabiix8
Thecryptolak August 8, 2025
It is a prominent state, as it has become the essence of the distinction between the state of digital assets between securities and commodities. In this, SEC claims that XRP is safety, while Ripple defends it as “not safe.”
It is important because it was the first case of SEC between The highest encrypted currencies by the maximum market. Its results would form the organization of encryption and more.
Main Time Tables, Transformation points and final referee of the Ripple VS SEC lawsuit
Everything began on December 22, 2020, when the US Securities and Stock Exchange Committee (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, Blockchain behind XRP. Along with the company, CEO Brad Garlinghyus and co -founder Chris Larsen were withdrawn in a lawsuit, as the Supreme Education Council claimed that its sale to XRP was an unregistered offer.
The case was also revealed, turning into more than one conflict between the company and the organizer. Instead, the entire encryption market has been withdrawn, affecting the prices of digital assets on multiple occasions.
2021 – Ripple returns again
It is worth noting that the Ripple VS SEC lawsuit became a high -level case in 2021, when Ripple responded with a dismissal movement. During January 2022, the court ruled that XRP sales were a security deal. However, in the same year, in April, Judge Angia Torres spent not qualified as securities.
The case lasts for another three years, in 2023 years of discovery and deposit. This year, both parties exchanged internal documents. Moreover, Ripple pressed XRP treatment as a currency and argued about SEC’s organizational lack of clarity, pointing to SEC internal emails and classification of unexplored cryptocurrencies within their team.
2024 – XRP claim begins
The trials began in late 2024, witnesses were submitted, and the testimonies of the experts witnessed court sessions. At this stage, the case approached its end, but the court imposed a $ 125 million penalty on Ripple due to institutional sales violations. However, they denied the request of the Supreme Education Council to dismantle profits and financial responsibility limited to Ripple.
Ripple’s victory became more important when SEC abandoned its appeal in March 2025. By March 8, 2025, the XRP lawsuit was officially concluded as the two sides fell their appeal, and Ripple agreed to pay $ 50 million.
August 2025 – The case ends
Now, Ripple VS SEC is officially ended on August 7, and the chief legal official of Ripple. More importantly, Judge Angia Torres also spent that XRP was not safe.
Related questions (common questions)
The lawsuit revolves around the Supreme Education Council accusing Ripple of making unregistered securities, which are denied by Ripple.
The lawsuit is the main issue of SEC against the upper cryptocurrency, and its results may affect the regulation of encryption in the United States
The final judgment is that “XRP is not safe.”
<!–
–>
<!–




–>
<!–
–>
Leave responsibility: The content and the personal views of the author and the current market conditions reflect. Please do your own research before investing in encrypted currencies, because the author and the post is responsible for any financial losses.
AD disclosure: This site may feature content with care and subsidiary links. All ads are clearly marked, and advertising partners have no effect on our editing content.
<!–
View all






–>
https://coingape.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Ripples-4-Year-Lawsuit-Battle-with-the-SEC-End.webp
2025-08-09 04:32:00
 
				



partner: