Critical Minerals: Canadian production could lower more than 50% in 2040 star-news.press/wp

In this period of commercial war, critical minerals have a great Canadian asset. However, injected injected in the sector are not sufficient to meet the demand for demand, according to a study published by the Canadian Climate Institute (ICC).

Analysis, 2040. In 2023 the amounts of $ 9.2 million in critical minerals were lowered to $ 4 billion in $ 2040. Up to 56.5% fall.

This restriction could cost the country very much, that the national demand for critical minerals must reach $ 16 million in 2040, four times more than expected production.

We found that the local request will increase in the next 15 years, and will reduce local productionMarisa Beck supports the Director of Clean Growth Research at the Canadian Climate Institute.

Research Organization New Bloomberg Energy Finance Report the request for critical mineral between 21200% and 2050%, according to ore and ecological goals, refers to the report.

Canada has plenty of critical mineral reserves, including lithium, copper, nickel, cobalt and graphite, all the necessary energy technologies to produce clean and durable, but only a small part of today, according to the study.

Canada recommends that the critical mineral market is growing, investing in the mining sector.

2040. It would therefore be required to comply with local demand for 30 million dollars in the sector, and $ 65 million in international demand, in addition to creating thirty new mines throughout the country.

In general, the mining sector is a global sector with global capital movements and many companies also work worldwide. So it is likely that these capital will come from international sourcesMrs. Beck launched.

In addition, the report will simply remove Canada’s implementation of certain projects that slow down, but it should be innovative if local and foreign investor wants to attract local and foreign investors.

Open full screen

The study also suggests negotiating the difference, signed between the government and investor, which will allow both entities to share risks related to price volatility, with reference price.

This allows the price of the minerals in the market to be above or below the price of both entities, which will return the amounts that investors or government will be excessive.

Open full screen

We try to find tools that limit the load of tax. Therefore, we do not suggest direct grant grants to sharing risks, but risk sharing risks, which shares the ability of government decline and the capacity to lift these projects.He explains Mrs. Beck.

Ian London, Director General of the Canada Alliance and General Manager and responsible for critical materials.

We need to consider the entire value chain. We can lose a dollar money or ore or mineral (or) for each robot we earn 100 dollars. It is a different economic model, but that is the essence of the developmentHe says.

If we are not competitive in terms of basic trade, it is a government that takes all the risks, but companies must also participate.

4:49

In addition, the Canadian Climate Institute offers governments to develop mining projects for various level collaboration model, prioritizing indigenous peoples Free and illustrated authorizationTo avoid the courts and other disputes that would extend the implementation of the desired projects.

I think we have finally seen the conflict over the local opposition (…) participation and permit participation in part of indigenous communities, that these processes make more fluids and facilitate project developmentAdvance Beck.

Open full screen

For his part, Mr. London believes that different levels of government must learn to renounce Want to persuade aspects against projects.

If this community does not (…) do not follow the project and do not try to persuade, because they do not have some cases against the project (Mining, Editor’s note).

Looking for perfection, we lose everything good. We seek to maximize the returns of the return investment, with no additional costs for the project, making them all happyemphasizes.

Open full screen

You cannot maximize each dimension. For six months, our best friends (United States) We put the country in the implementation with us, because we were not prepared because we look for perfectionAdds Mr. London.

Reduce project development processes

2040. To establish about thirty mines, the study remembers reducing processes related to the development of mining projects.

To this end, the evaluation times of the impact of mining projects on communities will be significantly reduced, but without losing efficiency.

Mrs. Beck provides regional risk assessment and at the same time it would be a combined study of various projects.

3:48

Maybe we could identify open areas for investment, and the information collected in the regional level will be available to the communities of the project developers so that things are clear from the beginningResearch director has pointed out.

Ideas, therefore, to study various projects, at the same time, to collect information that can clarify federal project evaluations, to accelerate it and that the information is really useful for all aspects that concern.

For London London, to establish new mines and infrastructures for the development of critical materials, Canada should produce most effective production and mineral critical mineral.

Customer should evaluate what he wants, is it most important? Can we deliver this opportunity faster to take advantage of this? Is there any projects that mean? This is the work you need to do and download Specifies.