The householders are pushing for legislation that would abolish the federal excise tax on the closed darkness services in a closed dark, which are in place at affordable care (ACA) since 2010. years.
On Monday, house routes and the Committee acquitted the draft of the spacious tax and the spending package called “one big, beautiful account”. One proposal calls for excise duty on the closed tung sunscreen, which were originally implemented to help finance ACA and discourage the use of closed sunbathing.
Why is it important
According to disease control and prevention centers (CDC), sunb beds significantly increase the risk of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer. Proponents of the reputation claim that the tax is disproportionately affecting small enterprises that provide tanning services and unfairly target the sun industry compared to similar services that are not taxed.
What to know
According to the current law, internal sunscreen services are defined as any service using equipment that includes ultraviolet (UV) lamps intended for tanning skin. 10 percent of excise duties applies to the total costs of these services.
If the proposed legislation passes, the abolition shall enter into force immediately upon the adoption.
The IRS notes that the tax refers to any lucrative sunbathing service, including those offered in fitness centers and other facilities, unless especially excludes. Some small business owners criticized taxes, claiming that he led to the declining of income and increased financial stress.
Alex Brandon / AP
According to the Report on Tax Foundations, when tax entered into force 1. July 2010. years, it is originally expected to collect $ 2.7 billion for 10 years. The Joint Taxation Committee revised to a projection to 1.5 billion dollars in 2012. years due to compliance with lower expected and reduced demand for taminer services.
Think Tank said that the tax was passed in 92 million dollars in 2014. year, far below $ 300 million originally provided for that year. According to the tax foundation, compliance was a challenge, with 11,000 of about 25,000 tourism companies that pay the tax quarterly in 2011. years.
In addition, the exclusion of the gym and fitness from taxes reduced the tax base, disproportionately affects smaller, independent sunbathing salons.
Unintended economic consequences of taxes included a significant number of sunbathing salons output from business and higher loan rates among sunshine preps in countries like Florida.
The measure for the abolition of the federal excise duty on the sunset service is part of the expansive package for taxes and consumption called “one large, beautiful account”. The draft law also includes elimination of overtime tax, loan for American cars and social security. It is estimated that the tax reduction in the account cost over $ 5 trillion.
In addition to tax reforms, the account proposes significant changes in social programs. Medicaid and supplementary dietary program (SNAP) would see stricter needs for work and changes in costs in countries, potentially leading to millions of health coverage. Legislation also includes provisions for deflunnation of planned parenting and abolishing taxes on weapons mufflers.
In the front of education, the Bilnik aims to overhaul plans for loan repayment, imposed taxes on large university indebtedness and expand fossil fuel extraction to public countries. Also introduces the accounts “Maga” for newborns
Defensive and border safety are also focal points, and the bill that separates billions for the revival of the Trump Border Wall, increase deportations and fund the new Defense Rocket system called the “golden dome”.
What do people say
Steven Rattner, former chief of the Presidential Working Group on the car industry, X (former Twitter): “Among the obscure characteristics of the banknote is the abolition of a sun salon tax. I can’t get more money than that.”
WENDY SHERMAN, Former Deputy Secretary of State, X: “Tax universities more, wipe the tax on sunbathing salons … Really?!”
What happens next
The draft law, which approved by the domestic and medium committee on Wednesday, could see the vote in the house as soon as next week.
But while the account has advanced through several household committees, its passage remains uncertain due to the internal republican divisions and the scheduled resistance in the Senate.
Members of the Conservative Freedom Dealing require a deeper reduction in Medicaid and the immediate application of assistance recipients, not the delayed commencement proposed in the account. At the same time, moderate republicans of high-tax countries, such as New York, advocates a significant increase in state and local taxes (salt). The existing proposal for lifting the cover with 10,000 on $ 30,000 is considered insufficient than these legislators, which are arguing for the higher threshold to be used by their voters.
Even if the account passes the house, faces additional obstacles in the Senate. Some Senate Republicans have already expressed skepticism on account provisions. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin referred to the house budget plan as a “sad joke”, while the Senator Rand Pucky Kentucky criticized the costs as “Wimpy” and “anemic” and “anemic” and “anemic”.
2025-05-16 16:30:00
