Did Pete Hegseth have violated the law of war plans? Experts as hard as star-news.press/wp

The Secretary of Defense Pete Hegsetth may have violated the law using the civilian application for sharing extremely sensitive war plans, the former military attorney said.

Why is it important

After the editor there was a huge outage Atlantic The magazine discovered that he was involved in Hegset’s group something in front of the American bombing of the Huuthi rebels in Yemen.

Newsweek He was looking for a commentary on Tuesday from the National Security Council and Defense Department.

What to know

In an article for Atlantic Published online, Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of the magazine, wrote that he was accidentally invited to the Group Members of the National Safety Team. “

Goldberg wrote that 13. March National Security Adviser Michael Waltz added it to the Chat signal called “Houti PC Little Group”.

Goldberg wrote that the conversation in the group chat culminated in the Secretary of the Pete Hegsetth Determination of Pentarogos’s Pentarogos, who were initiated by the attacks on Western commercial vessels in the red sea for more than a year.

What do people say

David French, a former military attorney, wrote an article in New York Times 25. Marta In which he wrote that Hegset could potentially face criminal charges.

“I don’t know how Pete Hegseth may look in the faculties in the eye. It’s just blown up his credibility as a military leader,” French wrote.

French is a former lawyer with Military Judge for General General Lawyer (Jag Corps) and is very familiar with the processing of military security breach officers.

“This would be an amazing security violation. I helped explore numerous allegations of classified information, and I did not hear that in Chat shared sensitive war plans without any remarkment of journalists,” French wrote.

“There is no officer whose career would survive security like that.

Said New York lawyer COLLEEN KERWICK Newsweek not to predict a criminal complaint against Hegset.

“His behavior was roughly deviated from the Trade Station for the Defense Secretary. The immobilization of journalists on the signal conversation showed reckless disrespect for the safety of the army.

“While the damage was probably unintentional, negligence behavior continues to be a threat to the security of the army.

“However, no one was harmed and it does not satisfy the elements of the crime,” she said.

What happens next

Democrats call for an immediate investigation of leaks.

The leader of the Democratic House Hakeem Jeffries said in a statement that the leak was “completely unexplant and shocked with conscience.” He called on House Republican to join “in a quick, serious and material investigation into this unacceptable and irresponsible injury.”