A group of richest Canadians connects a group called “Patternal Millions” to increase the number of taxes they have to pay, with a model after similar movements in the United States and the UK.
But it is already pushing about the concept, before the team officially launched in Canada – to prevent higher taxes from opposing views from this country.
Talking about CBC news in advance of the Canadian team’s speed, members of millions of nationalions say that their organization is looking for extensive changes in this country for wealth and capital gains.
The team says that smaller income pays a large part of the income, the rich investors can take advantage of dividends, investments, and capital gains, which they pay and how to change.
“Millions of patriots, Who started in the US., Quickly realized this is an international theme, “Claire Trotier said, President of the Canadian branches.
“Every country must take a look at the way of designing their tax system to try to ensure greater correctness of the system.”
The organization said at the beginning when the rich people think of the rich, but it works to release research in early June to change the different wealth taxes on G7 nations. An event provided for in Ottawa will promote the idea of 2025 G7 as a host, Canada can encourage other nations that are taxed by rich citizens.
Changing the tax policy is also the explicit goal of the organization’s announcements and the announced financial ministers, which is the explicit goal of the organization, the Patriotic Canadian director of Dylan Dusseal.
The organization wants to enable the richest Canadians “to change the organization and lobby campaign, change the public narrative and change the law around tax fairness,” DusSealt said.
Canada’s capital tax increase is in force on June 25. Andrew Chang breaks misleading claims about changes from both sides of the political corridor and to pay new tax, how often to pay. Does it really have ultra rich?
Although Trump supports taxes on wealth
In the south, Donald Trump said the President “well,” he had taxed Americans to benefit people between medium-income and lower brackets.
“I would love it, really,” said Oval Office on Friday. The tax itself says he would be willing to pay more.
However, the houses of the representatives of the SPEAKERS of Mike Johnson and other Republicans have confrided the idea of growing rich taxes.
President Johnson said that last week he wanted to see a higher tax rate about $ 2.5 million, or $ 5 million for couples, Baccy ideas on Friday. “Republicans probably shouldn’t do it, but if I’m doing well,” Trump has written on social media.
Trump’s verbal – If they are loose, with the help of richness tax increases is not surprised by millions of nationalions Canada.
“(Trump) and his rich friends do not pay for income tax, as they do not claim income. It is just a sign of problems with the US tax system that is reflected in Canada,” said DusSeault.
Meanwhile, a member of the team lives on the Galiano island of BC, in 2010, created a Canadian technology company that was sold on Twitter and says the highest part of his family’s wealth in the Silicon Valley technology sector. The rich taxes are higher that Canada can keep it, live and work.
“If we want to grow business with knowledge, as the starting point of technology, (we need) a nice place to live. They help taxes and redistribution and good social services,” said Bryant.
New government to lobby
Recently the Federal Liberal Party Festival is tax changes and fines to appear in the Canadian revenue agency (CRA), a 3.8 trillion dollar.
Due to the lowest tax rate at the lowest tax rate, the lowest tax rate was likely to be interpreted as a tax cut – if not all Canadians earn income.
NDP was able to adhere to the official party status of the official party in the election, which labeled the tax rise.
“Why pay less tax less than those who are paying tax.
Specifically, the organization will be launched to promote the federal government, trying to reinstate a functional increase in how many Canadian rich in capital taxes.
Politics prediction aroused the opposition when he announced early 2024. At the time, the financial minister, Chrystia Freeland said he was planning to deal with what the tax name was called the topic.
Groups such as Calgary Calber’s Chamber of Commerce said that the changes of capital gains, especially when he played the richest Canadians, had been “negative signs of investment”.
Eventually, capital gains were established, and then liberals were delayed under Justin Trudeau. Then Mark Carney was completely canceled by the Prime Minister. Conservatives were also against tax rise.
Anti-Anxiety of Tax Anxiety in Current Climate
The principle of increasing taxes aimed primarily to lead was created a passionate reaction of a Canadian capitalist risk.
“If you want to use the tax policy, you said John Ruffino, the Chairman of the Council of the Court of the Court of the Court of MAVERIX, which refers to the Capital Changes in Capital Capital,” he said.Bad politics. “
“You don’t want to rich people, you don’t want capital, you don’t want entrepreneurship. That’s what we say? That’s what you really want?” Ruffolok said.
“If the answer isn’t well? Well, that’s what’s going to happen,” he said.
An expert taxed tax indicates the weakest economic indicators in Canada, along with anxiety around the US relationships, politicians will be efforts to make efforts to increase taxes.
“I think people can think about thinking about money, that Canada isn’t a good place,” David Duff said, Columbia at the University of British Columbia at Peter A. Allard School.
“We are also talking about a more political tax-agenda environment,” said an observation to follow two major major aspects of the Canadian federal federal federal aspects would not support the previous rise in the inclusion rates of inclusion.
Duff emphasizes that increasing richest taxes cannot be groundless entries for Canadian governments, but can be a symbolic expression.
“In many cases, these are the benefits of Canadian society and the economy to gain important wines or fortunes.
“On the contrary, in more than 30 years of experience in more than 30 years, it is very excessive … serious economic consequences of tax accessories,” he said.
Duff also also have more taxes to try to hide taxes, trying to make taxes easily, if done easily, that the taxes are higher “taxes would not be so angry.”
Donations are not enough: Millionaire
Donations and Philanthropy is an idea that are an alternative to the compulsory wealth tax, both the opponents and opponents of the Portal Group.
“It is not enough to wait for people to be a proactive decision to give their money and will give money to these different priorities, “Trotier, who participates in many philanthropic organizations, is a family foundation that commits hundreds of dollars.
Flip compared to the opponents must not be forced – through tax – to finance these priorities, especially if they need to control how money is used to govern governments.
“If you feel so passionately, nothing gives me so, for not giving nothing,” Ruffolok said he believes in the removal of his money.
“But I will decide who I will decide and why,” he added, he stated that Warren Buffett intends to do the same with his fortune.
94. Philutropo and Billionaire Billionaire has announced that at the end of the year, and at death, he will give 99.5% of his wealth to a charity confidence.
Bill Gates technology has committed a similar, saying, will be given 99% of its rest of his other technology fortune, will cost $ 107 million dollars.
Both The buffet and doors also argued that the rich will pay higher taxes.
However, millions of chairs Trotier feels a bigger problem about the subject: this tax should be used to deal with the gap that is growing from the rich and poor Canada than through the chosen causes.
The gap between the rent and poorest rent of the Canadian richness and the poorest rent in 2024, in 2024 by Canada Statistics in 1999 began collecting data.
Extension gap, at the time, investment gains – Something patriotic in Canada want to see taxes in this country
“Do we recognize that the massive difference in richness that is growing is a risk to democracy?” Said Trotier.
2025-05-11 08:00:00
