‘We recorded more than 8,000 cases online censorship’ – Twitchy star-news.press/wp

News Media Research Center has recorded more than 8,000 cases of online censorship.

Big Tech makes the war in the first correction. We recorded more than 8,000 online cases in a single censorship of our databases. https://t.co/ujbb9ttqrs

– MRC Newsbusters (@NewsBusters) June 15, 2025

The voice is to live in a nation of freedom.

Online censorship is a double coin. On the one hand, online media platforms are private companies and thus take rights to make business decisions. On the other hand, companies that need to have online communication and information dissemination market should allow communication and information.

Very widely used media platforms have a unique responsibility to maintain credibility about this issue. Even though they have their business and do their business, they maintain a part of that business properly and influence. Maybe the censors are “too big”. An important multimedia platform selectively dentenses certain content, selective censorship has disproportional impact on other media and communication. When censored content is censored, there is a different disruption to the flow of communication.

It can be a discussion about how, in practice, censorship was needed and the free talk must be balanced.

Some censors are required. If large, large or small platforms, certain content will not leave vulgar or other, in a reason, it can be the basis of enforcement of censorship. A problem is created when the direction of the objective censorship is extended when companies or non-censors include content. As it publishes a political candidate or office content, it is the news and not censored. There are other exceptions as well.

The goal must be as freedom as much freedom as possible, in general the right rules to regulate. Censorly as little as possible, rather than a number of independence of conference on juicy reasons.