The target of the entire Zuckerberg returns to witness stand, pushes back against FTC antitrust star-news.press/wp

Meta CEO Zuckerberg Spare Tuesday with the Federal Lawyer Commission for E-mail Commission, Facebook Founder wrote about why he wanted to get Instagram, as a Historical antitrust trial Taking targets illegally monopolized by the social media market entered his second day.

Zuckerberg returned to the witness on Tuesday to defend the Metava’s purchase of Instagram and WhatsApp, at a trial that could take the target to take two applications, Startups the the the the Tech Giant more than a decade I took over within the time of the social media.

Daniel Matheson, leading the FTC case against the target, claims Zuckerberg bought Instagram because he saw it as a threat to his company, not because he thought he could succeed.

While questioning Zuckerberg on Tuesday morning, Matheson noted that the Director General sent Instagram as “quickly growing, threatening, network”.

But Zuckerberg, who was the first witness in the trial, said Matheson could show the Court who indicated his concern about Instagram growth, he had a lot of talks about how much his company had been achieved to get a better product.

Zuckerberg encouraged back against Matheson’s claim that the reason for buying a company was to neutralize the threat.

“I think it’s wrongly expressing what the email was,” Zuckerberg said.

In his testing Zuckerberg, Matheson repeatedly brought an email – many of them more than a decade old – wrote Zuckerberg and his associates before the instagram acquisition.

While recognizing the documents, Zuckerberg often tried to reduce the content, saying he wrote them in the early stages of the acquisition and that what he wrote at the time did not caught the full range of his interest in the company.

Matheson also presented a message in which Zuckerberg wrote the former Chief Financial Director of Facebook that Instagram and Path, the application for social networks, but created meaningful networks that could be “very distracting for us.”

Zuckerberg testified that the message was written in the context of a wide discussion about whether they should buy companies to speed up their own development.

Zuckerberg also testified to buy a company, taking it off the market and building their own version was a “reasonable thing to do.”

The trial is one of the first major tests of the FTC President Donald Trump to cause great technology. The lawsuit was filed against the target – then called Facebook – 2020. year during the Trump of the first term. He claims that the company bought Instagram and WhatsApp on the zucchini competition and established an illegal monopoly on the social media market.

Facebook has purchased Instagram – which was an application for sharing photos without ads – for a billion dollars in 2012. years.

Instagram was the first company Facebook bought and held as a separate application. Until then, Facebook was known for its smaller “acquisition” – a popular silicone valley in which the company buys the launch as a way to hire their talented workers, then excludes the acquired company. Two years later, it did again with the WhatsApp messaging application, which bought for $ 22 billion.

WhatsApp and Instagram helped Facebook Move your work surface to mobile devices and stay popular with younger generations as rivals like SnapChat (who have also tried but did not try, but encountered it, but the tictok appeared.

However, the FTC has a narrow definition of a meta’s competitive market, excluding companies such as the Tiktok, YouTube and Apple’s messaging service from the rival considering on Instagram and WhatsApp.

Meta, meanwhile, says the FTC lawsuit “defies reality”.

“Evidence in the trial show what each 17-year-old knows: Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp compete with Chinese Tictok, YouTube, the Commission’s shares in this case that no agreement is indeed final”, said in the statement.

The U.S. District Judge James Boasberg chairs this case. At the end of last year, he denied a metain request for concisely judgment and ruled that the case must go to the trial.