Does a lawsuit be threatened by $ 1 B against Hunter Biden? star-news.press/wp

Legal analysts have created whether the threat of the lawsuit for Shiites was the first of the Shiites from mechanism, Trump, by billions of dollars against Hunter Biden, deserves.

Why do it matter

Trump threatened to file a lawsuit against Hunter Biden, the son of former President Joe Biden, accusing him of “false, defamatory, underestimated, and inflammatory statements” during an interview in which Jeffrey Ibstein claimed her husband, President Donald Trump.

If you follow this threat, the case can test the limits of the defamation law that includes high -ranking individuals such as the first family.

The Trump administration was subject to scrutiny due to its dealings with a set of documents and files related to Ibstein, the disgraceful financier who died due to suicide in the federal prison in New York in 2019 while waiting for a trial for sex trafficking.

There were long rumors about the “Epstein” and Trump’s campaign on a greater transparency in the case. However, Trump’s Ministry of Justice did not issue these files, providing a violent political cold against him.

What do you know

Hunter Biden made these allegations about Melania Trump during an interview with journalist Andrew Callen earlier this month, citing an article from the Daily Beast newspaper based on Trump’s biography demands Michael Wolf. The Daily Beast fell to that story after receiving a message from the lawyer of the First Lady challenges her address and framing it.

Melania lawyer Trump, Alejandro Breto, sent a message to Hunter Biden and his lawyer, Abe Lille, on August 6, 2025, reported Fox News Digitter. He said Biden’s comments “are very horrific and have been widely published in various digital media.”

In an interview with Kalhan on Thursday, Biden refused to apologize, saying: “This will not happen.”

Former Federal Prosecutor Nima Al -Rahmi said Newsweek This is in theory, Melania Trump has a “strong issue against Hunter Biden” if his statement is already wrong.

Al -Rahbani said: “As a general figure, the first lady will have to prove the slag, and that the young Biden knew that the statement was false or that he acted with a reckless ignorance of the truth. But if Epstein did not present the president and the first lady, it will not be difficult to prove this.”

If the first lady submitted the lawsuit, Biden is likely to file the first amendment arguments, including that political discourse receives strong protection from freedom of expression.

Practically, however, Al -Rahmi said he did not believe that Melania Trump will offer. If she does, she and her lawyers may search for a quick settlement.

Al -Rahbani said: “The president was very disputed when it comes to these types of cases, but the truth is an absolute defense of defamation. A civilian questions how Donald and Melania met and their relationship with Epstein, if any, in the case.” “This means that the president and the first lady will have to sit in order to deposit and answer questions about Epstein. Hunter may dig in his followers and pay the case to trial or the brink of the abyss, as he did with his criminal cases.”

Hamani said that the trial about Trumps and Ibstein will be a “circus”, and no one wants to be associated with two heads.

However, former Federal Prosecutor Shanon Wu said he believed that Melania Trump has no strong issue against Hunter Biden.

“It is very difficult for a public figure like the first lady to be able to claim defamation,” said Wu.

He said that the case may also be difficult to prove because the data arises from the Wolf book. You will not only have to prove that the claim is wrong, but Hunter Baiden knew or should have known that it was a mistake.

Wu said: “It will be different if the only person who started these rumors or something like that, but given the presence of other people – it may be in reality, but there are other sources available to the public – become more than a defamation suit based on the idea that you are not allowed to refer to other stories that have been reported to the public.”

He added that the defamation experience “will not be very useful at all” for the audit that the Trump administration faced on Epstein.

What people say

Melania’s lawyer Trump, Alejandro Brito, wrote in his notification to Hunter Biden: “Failure to comply with Mrs. Trump will leave without any option except to follow any legal rights and treatments available to her to restore financial harm and reputation that caused her suffering.”

Hunter Biden said in the fifth channel: “What I said is what I heard and saw reporting and book, in the first place of Michael Wolf, but also returns to 2019 when the New York TimesI think Annie Carney and Magy Haberman reported that the sources said that Jeffrey Epstein claimed that he was the person who presented Donald Trump to Melania at the time.

Then I think excerpt in a book published in Vanity FairAnd I think he has repeated journalists and authors since then. But the primary source was the interviews Michael Wolf, in fact, had tapes of hours and hours of interviews with Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, as you know, the truth of the matter, as you know, I do not think that these threats of the lawsuit add anything else other than the destruction of the design because it is not related to the one who presented to whomever. I don’t know how this rises in any way to the level of defamation to start. “

Nick Clemens, an assistant to Melania Trump, previously told Newsweek: “The lawyers of the first lady, Melania Trump, are actively guaranteed to decline and immediately apologize by those who have published a defaming malicious liar. The true account of how the first lady met in her best -selling book, Melania“

What happens after that

Whether Melania Trump will end the lawsuit against Hunter Biden has not yet been seen. If so, this will receive great attention during the first amendment and defamation law test.