The map reveals states with the lowest school spending star-news.press/wp

The report from the American census bureau shows significant differences in public school throughout the country, and the lowest states of consumption largely grouped in the south.

Data, which songs record consumption on the state, painting the oldk image of educational inequality and places fresh concerns about the long-term effects on student results.

Newsweek He contacted the Education Department for a comment by e-mail on Tuesday beyond the usual working hours.

Why is it important

According to the list of censuses, countries such as Mississippi, Alabama, Oklahoma and Arkansas, every year they spend thousands of dollars less per student compared to many of their northern and coastal colleagues.

This regional inequality emphasizes the broader issue of educational inequality, because students in lower spending can face challenges such as larger classes, less resources and limited access to advanced courses.

What to know

The findings are illustrated on a map that shows the lowest states of consumption predominantly in the south, with a fist in the west and middle west. Meanwhile, countries like New York, Vermont, New Jersey and Connecticut appear at the top, with the highest expenses on the student.

Fixed data from fiscal year 2023. It shows that Idaho ($ 10,247), Arizona (11,297 dollars), Oklahoma (11,145 $) and Florida ($ 11,862) assigned the least funds per student.

The average consumption per student in the south is $ 13,344. In the Midwest, it’s $ 16,220, which is closely followed by $ 16,630 west.

Northeast countries lead the country in perception consumption, and New York overflow list on $ 30,012 per student.

However, as a whole, Columbia County, in the south, had the most expenditure per student of $ 31,629.

The gap in consumption is closely related to economic and political factors – including tax base differences, formulas and local investment in education – which have historically led to the need for fair funds in education.

In March, President Donald Trump announced the dismantling of the Department of Education, which could have a significant effect on states that rely on federal financing.

What do people say

While the report of the census bureau does not connect direct spending on academic performance, Some studies Suggest that adequate financing plays a critical role in improving student achievements, especially for students from low income families.

Proponents call for increased investments in public education, especially in regions, historically endangered by less consumption, claiming that the assurance is to ensure that all students, regardless of their housing, have access to quality education and opportunities for academic success.

What happens next

The October Legislative Report from the Southern Regional Education (SREB) has shown that in terms of legislative and budget actions for Oklahoma, which has the lowest expenditures per student in the south, the following budgets were agreed:

$ 3.9 billion for State Department for Education, Falling 2.7 percent

7.2 million dollars for Oklahoma school science and mathematics, drop 3.7 percent

$ 1 billion for Oklahoma Regents for higher education, up 2 percent

448.3 million dollars for a retirement system in the amount of 2.6 percent

196.3 million dollars for the career education and technology department, increased 19.2 percent

$ 2.1 million for the Quality and Responsibility Office, an increase of 12.3 percent

Earlier Report SREB from May 2024. He presented a summary of educational budgets, including Member States, including Annual Budget Proposals, Arkansas, Delaware, Louisiana, Maryland, North Carolina, Oklahoma and Tennessee.

The two reports show a significant difference between what was requested and what was granted in several southern countries.