A decade later, how Obergefeld Drawed Drawing, Culture and Cuza star-news.press/wp

A Supreme Court 10 years ago the definition of marriage to expand the same-sex couples, a 5-4 milestone resolution that has changed the course of the U.S. – also touches deep changes in public opinion, as well as seismic cultural changes.

“No longer denied that freedom”, “Supreme Court Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority.” The court now may have a basic right to marry the same-sex couples. “

Decision of Obergerfell V. Hodges in June 2015 Same-sex couples assured that they are the same protection and benefits of their heterosexual classmates.

However, the resolution is not without its detectors. In fact, 10 years after the decision of the High Court, the last survey shows that the public opinion of the same sex marriage is divided than ever.

Gorsuch, Roberts difference with left-handed highest court justices in immigration trial

Obergerfell’s 10-year anniversary also comes in political moment. The White House and Congress are governed by January 2025, a new conservative majority – some Republican Legislators who have expressed interest in questioning the decisions of the Forensic Court.

The Supreme Court of the Majority of Conservative has taken LGBTQ + EDUCTION, with gender-related attention and more important cases.

After ten years of the Court’s milestone, here’s the look where things are.

Public opinion

National legalizations of the same sex marriage have made unions more visible, with increasing the number of Americans with personal links to the directors of the Supreme Court directly affected by the person.

In fact, the number of married sex couples in the US has doubled since 2015, according to data Williams Institute UCLA Law at University.

In the decade, the Supreme Court has since the help of Obergerfell’s wedding, largely with the help of independent democrats and independent voters, although the perception of aspects and demographics have seen in the last 10 years of the Gallup surveys.

Almost 10 of the US 10 voters, or 68% of Americans said that this year support the same-sex marriage, according to the Gallup survey in the last month compared to the maximum of 60% in 2015.

With public aid, President Joe Biden protects the same-sex marriage in 2022, 2022. By signing the respect of marriage law.

SCOTUS rules with a ban on gender transition to minors in landmark cases

Hundreds take part in the annual parade of DC Pride on June 8, 2024. (Astrid Riecken / Washington Post via Getty)

While the law sorts the states or territories to marry the same-sex couples, it requires a recognition of marriages as legitimate.

However, this does not mean that these actions have been without a detector.

The opposition is growing in the state and federal level

Same sex marriage support has been left in recent years.

There is no clear what kind of change he pushed. However, some Republican legislators in the country have requested at least the High Court in the High Court, through symbolic resolutions, to review Obergerfell and change the marriage of the same national rights.

In fact, in 2024 the state legislature included more than 500 “anti-LBGT” bills, According to ACLUR. Although there were a few of these bills, the sides of sex marriage are scared of growing LGBTQ + protections, and can be an indicator of future opposition – to finally avoid the legal challenge for Obergerfell.

Some left have made a call for trans-inclusion efforts. (Mark Kerrison / in Images via Getty Images)

Forensic Background, Executive Action

The Supreme Court of the Supreme Court has made more decided on how the Conservative Court Court is prescribed according to the same-sex marriage, as it should be challenged in Obergerfell’s challenge.

Justice via the nation sent shock waves in 2022 Roe v. Wade, when they eliminated the right to abortion. The decision also sparked upgraded fears that the General Court can review the same sex marriage protection.

Justice Clarence Thomas, for his part, explicitly suggested the Court should make the opinion of his majority Dobbs v. Jackson, The case that exceeds the roe, The court has a “duty” to correct the “Obergefell and other similar cases” “established”.

“In future cases, we should re-examine the antecedents of the substantive cost of courts … (included)”.

President Donald Trump declined, largely to weighing in public.

However, the actions of action in Bidera, among others, signing the executive request, indicates that the US will only recognize “both sexes”. back to a copy of the text.

President Donald Trump signed an executive request at the oval office of the White House. Trump commanded the office in the first day US will only recognize “both sexes” “, growing worries about men and women, LGBTQ + defenders. (Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)

Next steps

Experts said that the Fox News digital would not surprise the Republicans challenges to Obergerfell, especially the decision of the Supreme Court this month before United States v. Skrmetti – Justification of the High Court voted 6-3 times, which prohibits certain medical care, such as adolescent and hormone therapy, state transsexual teens.

Skrmetti was one of the most nest cases of the Supreme Court period and in the case of Legal Aclu and Lamda, the case was considered an excuse for the future cases of LGBTQ + Sponsider.

“I wouldn’t be surprised that someone tried to scowl the wedding equality,” Ethan J. Leibek, a professor of Fordham, said Fox News Digital, following the decision of the Court last week.

The Supreme Court freeze the man to return from El Salvador prison

Activist protests against trans rights outside the Supreme Court before the start of oral arguments in the United States. Skrmetti case. The court ruled 6-3 on June 18, 2025 to challenge Tennessee Law for transsexual activists in a blow. (Bill Clark / CQ-Roll Call, Inc Getty Images)

He expressed justices in front of the great NEHI JOIL GORSUCH (Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett).

“I think it’s another case, about the adults of transgender,” there are “technical differences” between them. He said to distinguish himself from other conservatives on the court.

It seems that Roberts went to great lengths, to determine what is counted as a sexual classification, after all, could be “much harder” to dissolve the moving term.

Click here to get Fox News app

At the end of the day, Leib said, “I wouldn’t be surprised if someone had tried to desire for marriage equality” and the protections provided by the federal law.

“I think I would be surprised if I were five votes,” said the majority votes to overturn ObergFell. “But you know, but I could have counted five ways.”