On Sunday, legal and constitutional experts warned that the US could be directed to the “Constitutional Crisis” or “System Breakdown” after JD Vice President.
“If a judge attempted to do the general operation of the military operation, it would be illegal. If a judge trying to promise the chief attorney, it is illegal,” Vance wrote a charge Xn, adding, “judges do not control the legitimate executive power”.
It wasn’t clear what a judge or court was referring to the advantage, or whether he was making a broad statement. Vance’s comments have been a legal block of trump leaders who have worked for legal blocks since the office took office.
A vance spokesperson has not answered the questions for NBC news questions.
Some Trump’s request executive challenges have already been challenged by the two dozen disputes and judge a number temporarily. On Saturday, a federal judge temporarily blocked the billionaire section of Trump and Tech Musk, the Government Department of the Treasury Department of the Treasury Department and the American Personal Data after 19 State Lawyers.
Jamal Greene, Professor The Vance said Vance was not explicitly said that the Trump Administration was ready to ignore the forensic orders.
“I think tweets have been taken on vacuum, because the legitimate capacity of the executive refers to the” legitimate power of the executive “. And the whole question in these cases is whether the executive plays legitimately, “said Greene said NBC news.
“(Santea) has some covers in that regard,” Greene added. “He has not commanded illegal behaviors.”
Rick Pildes, the school of Law at the University of New York, also pointed to the use of the words “legitimate power” in his position, but the judicial power noted that the power of the President can do “legitimately”.
“According to law and the Constitution, they are the courts that determine whether or not the use of the executive power is legal. That is the critical point,” Pilds said NBC news via email.
“It is concern to suggest that the President’s statement is ready to comply with a court order based on the President, the courage that the courts have not concluded.” The President of the Forensic Order would create a Constitution Crisis. “
Green stated that others in the president’s orbit, including Musks, have ignored the courts of the courts.
Saturday, Musk reposted A message by X “I don’t like it at all, I don’t anticipate you at all when you challenge a judicial judgment, but I’m wondering what other options are being scared.”
“This context has occurred (Vance’s Post), it seems that a commandment is on the table to the table,” Green said.
In A separate message Xn, Musk called the Federal Paul Engelmaker Judge, who arrive at the Data Department of Dane Employees in the morning.
“A corrupt judge that protects corruption,” he wrote Musk. “Now it’s time to leave!”
DOGE staff, for example, if they had to continue accessing the Data Department of the Treasury, EngelMayer would have little appeal.
“The bottom line is that our system is predicted with good faith, but the American law means that the government meets the judgments of the courts,” Dan Urman, a teacher of Law at the Northeastern University told NBC News.
“The crisis of the bunch,” said Urman, “Courts do not lack the power of the Federalists and the power of the sword, nor have a great budget. They must trust their legitimacy.
While the courts would have a few ways to punish their resolutions for violating their resolutions, the third branch of government – Congress – has a way of intervention.
“The key point is that the executive was playing legally, if he did that,” Green said. “The solution within the Constitution design is impossible.”
Right now, Republicans control each branch of the federal government, so the chances of the fairer the fair and removal of their party are slender.
“If the Congress does not do this, it’s not much that it can be done,” Green said. “That is the moment you don’t work in a constitutional self-government system.”
The “Greene” branch added to prevent the judicial office, “he added,” and simply does not respond to a conference who refuses to confirm his own institutional prerogy is the distribution of the system. . “
Urman added that the American political system is designed to act with each other equal branches of the government.
“Courts can’t do all the work,” he said. “If they have more support from other horns and society itself, right? It doesn’t work only when they are playing.”
2025-02-09 23:00:00
