Aileen Cannon speaks Taylor Swift to wait to answer the copyright lawsuit star-news.press/wp

Judge Aileen Cannon ordered a Pop star Taylor Swift and her co-creaters in copyright lawsuit not to answer until everyone served.

Why is it important

Kimberly Marasco, artist Florida, filed a lawsuit in February against Swift, Swiftwriters Jack Antonoff and Aaron Desner, Universal Music Group, Inc. and Republic records for alleged copyright infringement.

Marasco filed a separate lawsuit against Swift last year and its production company last year, through which the cannon and cannons. Cannon rejected Swift from the case after Marasco failed to serve a lawsuit in a timely manner. Allegations against its production Taylor Swift Productions are not rejected.

What to know

Cannon, which in that case, chaired, was issued by the order on Friday. She stated that “no accused will not bear the answer or response until all the accused were served in this action.”

Cannon said this would help “better manage the orderly advance of the case”.

After all the accused were served, they can file a unique common response or separate answers at the time given the last defendant to answer.

The case, originally awarded Jose Martinez judge, was transferred to the cannon last week. The order of transmission said that “a good reason that appears that the transfer of this case is appropriate” due to the “related case” cannon is predicted.

The universal musical group and republic records returned the executed call.

The call for Swift was returned unemployed unemployed. Earlier this month, an individual attempt at a lawsuit service in California assets. He said he could not find quick or information about him.

Who is Kimberly Marasco?

Marasco was published by the author of two poetry. She asks the Court for more than $ 30 million damage between two lawsuits.

What emphasizes the Maraška’s lawsuit?

MARAŠKA REGART The SWIFT songs and music videos have “creative elements” which is copied by its work without permission or loan. A lawsuit of songs and videos from several Swift albums, including Lover and Folklore.

What is the status of the case?

As the stage of Marško’s other lawsuit continues, Cannon faced a key decision in the first lawsuit.

Cannon has not yet decided to reject receivables against Taylor Swift production, filed by lawyers for the production 21. January.

What do people say

Kimberly Marasco, in appeal filed in February: “As a direct and / or transparent result of unjust behavior of the accused, the prosecutor was irreparably harmed. There were no violations in the future. Such reproduction was completely unauthorized because it was without any permission or the conspiracy of the plaintiff.”

What happens next

The call was not successfully returned to Swift, Antonoff and Dessner. The universal musical group and republic records must wait until all the accused are served to file a response.

Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covered? Do you have questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@newsweek.com.