“There is no parliament, nor the executive,” The Chairman of the Constitution of the Discussion and Rajy Sabha MP, President India must decide that governors must decide within three months of the invoices reserved by its members.
The controversy has been a permanent question.
Dhankhhar’s confirmation: Primary of Parliament
Aimed at the University of Dhankhhar, President Dhankhhar, also offered as President of Rajya Sabha, stated that the “Supreme Parliament” and the Constitution does not anticipate any authority.
Dhankhar argued that representatives of the elected representatives are the last masters of the conception of the Constitution that parliament’s dominance is as essential as the sovereignty of each individual in a democracy.
Dhankhar intensified that constitutional functionalities are not only ceremonies or decorations, and all such words are driven by the highest national interests.
Dhankhhhar’s notice were mentioned in the context of the Supreme Court criticism, charcured by the President and Governors by prescribing the legislation period.
Dhankhhhar Vice-President. “Nuclear missile” described the use of article use “nuclear missile” against democratic forces, to question the authority of the judiciary, to correct the president on such issues.
Capil Sibal’s rebuttal: Constitution is the highest
At one point, the former President of the Sibal Kapil, former Union Minister and the Union of the Supreme Court Assembly, confronted Jagdeep Dhankhar’s claims on social media.
Sibal, does not parliament and not the highest executive; The Constitution is the highest. The provision of the Constitution interprets the Supreme Court. Thus understood this country so far the law of the law “Act”.
Kapil Sibal stressed the final judgments of the Supreme Court, criticized by government officials, consistent with constitutional values and guided by national interests.
The Sibal also featured different roles assigned by the Constitution: Parliament has the power to stroll itself, the court has a duty to interpret the Constitution and has a duty to ensure full justice in accordance with the Article 142.
About the dignity and neutrality of the Constitutional Office
Capil Sibal criticized what he described as a politically stump from Rajya Sabha chair, think of the opposition and the party authorities must be evident.
Sibal warned that perception of partiality weaken the dignity of the Constitutional Office, a speaker or president must not be seen as any spokesperson
2025-04-22 12:13:00
