Johnson & Johnson loses in court again to resolve Talk cases star-news.press/wp

A federal judge of bankruptcy Johnson & Johnson refused Tens’s dust products that caused tens dust products caused by $ billion.

Proposals The company’s Talk products were asbestos and caused cancer that they would solve almost all current and future claims. Like the previous two efforts – in 2021 and 2023 – Agreements attempted to use an element of the failure system to solve claims.

Johnson & Johnson says that his products did not have as many asnes and there has been proven between its products and cancer, Christopher Lopez, in his tenure. Johnson & Johnson has long declined these claims, but in recent years it has stopped selling the Talc based baby.

There are more than 90,000 claims against Johnson & Johnson and other aspects, many also process the courts individually.

The company and lawyers brought claims to the defendant solutions against the failure of failure failure and against other plaintiffs, the judge said.

On Monday, Johnson and Johnson said, “The court has given it unfortunately with economically conflicted reasons. They have not given what we have given in a decade of recovery to defeat the absolute desire of claimants.”

“Instead of getting a long appeal,” said the company, “he will return to the torture system to crest these claims for the meritulless talc”. He added about $ 7 billion to resolve failure.

Johnson & Johnson, products containing pharmacies and consumers including bands and listerine, argued that years were argued that his baby dust was safe. Internal memories within the company, there could be concerns that could be concerned that he could be contaminated with the asbestos, known as the Talcanogen.

Since 2021, critics believe that critics have taken a unjust way to deal with companies made in companies in the bankruptcy court. That year, the subsidiary, LTL managed management and left the baby dust. A day later, LTL failed.

Johnson & Johnson announced the presentation of the bankruptcy, in New Jersey, that the lawsuits intended to solve the “all aspects fairly fairs”. The company said he would give funds to the bankruptcy court decided that LTL was.

Plaintiff’s lawyers created LTL and almost an instant failure created as an example of “Two steps in Texas” – an effort to hide a solvent company. In January 2023, a federal judge rejected the presentation of LTL’s bankruptcy.

Three months later, the company announced that more than 25 years of 25 years earned an agreement to pay $ 8.9 million, after a decade, the attempt was to end litigation. Plaintiff’s lawyers in the case of “important victory” has been an important victory for thousands of women with gynecological cancer caused by J. & J.-based cancer. “

The U.S. Appeal Court for the Third Circuit discarded the settlement twice. Johnson & Johnson tried again, this time in Texas, and Lopez also rejected the judge. Plaintiff’s lawyers decided that they did not properly secure. Moreover, “To request screlogits, there has been a short time for low voting for thousands of credits,” he wrote.

“While the Court’s decision is not easy,” he said, “it is appropriate.”