A shock shock in the audiovisual session on the donations of the campaign star-news.press/wp

At the Senate Crypting Session today, Senator John Kennedy removed the procedures through a strange spousal. One of the witnesses, Dr. Richard Pinter, accused of “Whatjob from the next level” over one month of industry campaign contributions.

This Tirade was particularly strange because the tweet addressed a member of the Democratic Senate, and Kennedy himself is a Republican who did not receive major donations from this industry. Crypto has limited support from the two parties, but it may be fragile.

Senate encryption session starts from bars

The organization of encryption is a source of urgent concern for the US Legislative Authority at the present time, as important bills are progressing through the House of Representatives and the Senate.

The House of Representatives committees are preparing to study a group of existing bills, and the Senate Banking Committee is conducted hearing For the interface with the leaders of the encryption industry.

However, today’s encryption hearing took a strange turn when John Kennedy, a member of the Republican Senate, came to ask questions.

After Richard WW Eint, the former White House ethics lawyer, gave testimony about imminent legislation, Senator Kennedy began distorting the position of social media. The painter made this post in May, and it was not directly related to today’s testimony.

Specifically, the painter’s publication drew attention to the exclusive Beincrypto coverage of the political contributions of the encryption industry to the Gillbrand:

“Do you think Senator Gilbrand is a fraud? Why do you think the encryption industry buys the Senator Gilbrand? Do you want to apologize?” Kennedy asked. When a painter accused him of wasting the committee’s time and asked him to maintain the discussion, he focused on imminent legislation, Kennedy described him as “the next level.”

Looking at the intense intensity between Republicans and Democrats, this rant appears to be a little strange. Senator Kennedy’s comments were disrupted, unprecedented Disputed This Gillbrand has received wide -ranging contributions to the encryption campaign.

Moreover, Kennedy was not himself Recipient From the encryption donations in his last elections.

So why do Senator Kennedy do this? Even if Gillbrand’s Crypto contributions are related to today’s session, it is not a republic. If anything, Kennedy should jump into an opportunity to accuse a democratic of political corruption.

This incident may show the level of encryption support from the two parties in Congress. Many Democrats, some of whom have witnessed in today’s session, oppose the encryption industry and worked to impeding imminent legislation.

As a pro -Carbouto, Senator Gilbrand had a fundamental role in passing many bills.

In other words, members of the Senate, on a large scale, widely, on the same side of this issue.

Moreover, the focus on the painter’s tweet months ago turned the session away from his actual testimony against encryption legislation. The Kennedy Burn has prevented the members of the Council from the Council from housing the potential criticism of this industry.

However, this strange accident may highlight a fragile situation. Many encryption companies flirt with the activity of Democrats, but Trump’s industrial relations have become a political responsibility towards them.

Such incidents may make responsibility more urgent. If Democratic voters turns against Supporting politicians, this may cause troubles for party initiatives.