business

The oil company was sued for the death of the “wrong” dome star-news.press/wp

The US woman sues in seven oil and gas companies that brought his mother’s severe hyperthermis that he led to his serious hyperthermia, killed more than 600 people in BC

It is one of the first claims that want to respond to the fossil fuel industry in the changing climate.

As the case of the Washington State Court says, his products learned that they have changed the climate, among other things, to support Juliana on a wave of heat 2021 in a wave of heat, and there was no danger.

On June 28, 2021, an unusual heat wave ended 42.2 days a day – the hottest he ever recorded in the state, depending on the archive. Leon had once taken an appointment to 100 km from home, and he pulled his windows back because his car air conditioner did not work.

Leon pulled and parked in a residential car, according to the matter. They found unconsciously behind the wheel when he asked for help. Despite the medical interventions, Leon died.

Archives Exxon Mobile, Chevron, Shell, BP, Conocophillips, Phillips 66 and BPPic Pipeline Compeline Company Company.

Clock Poverty was the highest risk of BC heat dome during the month:

Highest risk of BC heat dome per month: poverty

A new report says that the number of financially vulnerable people disproportioned British Columbia died in 2021 heat dome ceremony. Many died did not have air conditioning.

“The defendants knew that their fossil fuels products were changing the Earth’s atmosphere,” when Juliana was born, when it was presented on Thursday. “1968. For the year, the defendants understood that economic changes between fossil fuels were understood, which predict the loss of more and more destructive weather and human life.”

The archive adds: “Julie killed the extreme heat was directly related to the change of fossil fuels of the climate.”

Chevron lawyers accuses the woman ‘exploitation of personal tragedy “

Chevron Corporation Teodore Boutrous Jr. said to promote climate torture.

Conocophillips, BP, Shell and BP subsidized subsidized Pipeline company was denied when he got the associated press. The rest of the companies did not respond to the requests for comment.

The lawsuit accuses companies that humans smoke oil and bend the risks of climate change caused by humans that interfere with research.

International researchers said it was 2021 “heat dome” in the study of the classmates “almost impossible” without “human impact climate change”.

Clock What factors took Canada Western and US heat dome:

What carried Canada western and the heat dome taken during the US

CBC meteorologist and science journalist Johanna Wagstaffe breaks the combination of unprecedented heat in North America, and how climate change is crucial in these extreme events.

Scientists broke the record, more durable, durable, and more and more worldwide, it is the result of burning fossil fuels. Oil and gas are fossil fuels, when they are burned, heated greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide.

“We have seen an advanced scientific act on specific consequences of climate change in extreme weather events,” said Korey Silverman-Roati Columbia in the Sabina Center. “Currently scientists have much more confident to say that, but for climate change, that would not happen.”

Silverman-Roatia said the specificity of the case to clarify the consequences of the consequences of climate change and the consequences of the company’s behavior.

The lawsuit was New York Times reported.

“Oil companies have known that their products would be more deadly and destructive if they have changed their business model more deadly and destroyed,” Richard Wiles said in a statement about the case, in a statement about the case. “But instead of warning the public instead of warning and the steps of saving lives, large oil lied and was deliberately accelerated.”

How different from other climates

States and cities have long been moved to help the planet’s warming after the agents of the fossil industry. Recently, Hawaii and Michigan anti-action plans anti-fueled for the damage caused by climate change, although the legal issues of the US Department of Justice have been met.

Clock Montana young people have won the ‘Game-Changer’ climate case:

The young man won the Montana Climate case, as he reported as a “game switcher”

The state of the Montana State Court has been commissioned by the State in 16 young people, violating the right to clean and healthy environment by claiming the use of fossil fuels.

The Trump Administration has been quick to exclude climate change and moved against the initiatives aimed at talking. The US retired the Paris Climate Agreement. Oceanic and atmospheric administration – The weather forecast and research workplace has made an agency. And the environmental protection agency has called the greenhouse gases to warm up the planet at risk of public health and well-being.

Meanwhile, the federal government has supported oil and gas production on behalf of a “American Energy Dominance” agenda, and has made many other efforts and projects to deal with climate change.

Around the world, other climate cases are being seen tight, setting the only background in an effort to make important contaminants. German court He ruled this week against a Peruvian farmer The emissions of the greenhouse gas emissions of the energy company were regulated global warming and endangered his home.

However, the case that these companies should argue, the death of the individual must be. Misti Leon seeks unspecified money damage.

“Looking forward, it’s hard to imagine that it will be an isolated event,” Don Braman said, Associated Professor of Law at George Washington University. “We are facing climate climbing crisis. This year, this year, it is the hottest record, which will be the prettiest we will experience for the future for the future.

“It’s forecasting or – to use legal term, foresee – loss of life-fed climate life is likely to increase climate chaos,” he added. “This is an argument about the guilty of fossil fuel companies, and these companies are based on great and increasing evidence understood by product risks.”

2025-05-30 16:57:00

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button