Doj asks judge to force google to spin chrome browser star-news.press/wp

In this story

Just Just the Department announced Monday to wish the federal judge to fall apart to Google (Googl+ 1,23%) In order to address the verdict that determined that the giant silicon valley has an illegal monopoly in network search – partly paying web browsers and smartphone manufacturers to contain their browser.

The government tired of Judge Amita P. Mehta to make Google sells his popular chrome web browser as part of an introductory statement of the judiciary in the three-week hearing on Monday in the US District Court.

This move could drastically modify the future of 1.9 trillion tests of giants.

The Department of Justice has requested other difficult punishments, such as the company’s development to provide rivals with some of its data on which the conditions of people are looking for and which websites are. The government also asked that Mehta keeps the ability to force Google to sell their operating system of smartphones, Android, if the suggested drugs do not return the search competition.

“Your Honor, we are not here for Piror’s victory,” said the lawyer of Justice David Dahlquist Uu Monday. “This is the time for the Court to tell Google and all other monopolists listening there – and listening to – that there are consequences when you stop the laws of diarrhea.”

This echoes feelings from the government on Friday.

“Google illegal behavior created an economic naked, the one that havests seek in the market to ensure that – no matter what happens – Google always wins,” they also wrote everyone. “American people are in that way forced to accept untranned requirements and relocation, ideological inclinations of the economic Leviathan in return for the search engine, the public can enjoy.”

Google said that in this case, in the end, you would eventually complain about the Mehta verdict in this case, American V Google.

The company’s attorneys said Monday to make Mehta closely focus in his solution – the type of bid Google has made companies like an apple like an apple (AAPL+ 2.21%)Mozilla and Samsung that makes their search default. John Schmidlein’s lead court courts said that the company’s proposal “reacts directly to the legal decisions of this court, but also works much more.”

In Blog post last weekGoogle Vice President Lee-Anne Mulholland asked the government to enable the company to pay other companies for the premiere placement, although the company received that these agreements would be less restrictive than those in the past. Mobile phone manufacturers using Google’s Android operating system could also install other search engines, and users could install Google Apps without installing your search tool or search assistant or sir and her assistant.

“We don’t propose these changes slightly,” Mulholland said. “But we believe that they are fully dealing with the findings of the Court and do so without putting Americans privacy and safety at risk or damage to American global technological leadership.”

Mehta is expected to order medications in that case by the end of the summer.

Google is facing other mounting issues, putting the company in a particularly vulnerable position. In a separate antitrustic subject on Thursday, the Federal Judge ruled that the company had Illegally held a monopoly In some online advertising technologies. As a result, the company could break their ad operations. And FTC in Japan recently sent a company to cease and disist After it was said that Google’s search practices are monopolistic.

Damian Rollison, director of market insights in Soci with AI, told quartz last week that Google is on the edge of large changes.

“This year, it will be one in which Google’s destiny hangs in balance,” he said. “The company is much more in the material sense, if his job, long his main source of income, which breaks down, while divisions like Chrome are more strategically important.”

Any significant restrictions on Google could limit his ability to compete in and empire with companies like Openai, Microsoft (MSFT+ 0.24%) and the target (Target-1.69%).

In a Separate blog postGoogle Mulholland called this lawsuit “a forward-prospects in time of intense competition and unseen innovations.” She added that “with new services such as Chatgpt (and foreign competitors such as Deepseek) who succeeded, doj’s portable drug proposals are unnecessary and harmful.”

Google’s home company, Alphabet, will report wages on Thursday in the middle of his legal stalemate. While investors hope to see the continuation of progress and control costs AI, and the shares remain about 20% this year.

2025-04-21 20:40:00

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *