Flashback: Dems Defend Harvard, Although Columbia Trump Financing Financing, despite protecting the same legal background in 1983 star-news.press/wp

Democrats defend university elites such as Harvard and Columbia, believing that their federal financing and tax-free situations, to violate the alleged public policy, now being used against them.

Left was a judgment of the United States of Bob Jones University of 1983. The decision confirmed the decision that the decision was banned by a religious university that prohibited the decision. At the time, Democrats agreed with the federal government argument that no discrimination organizations must be received by public funds, as well as about religious reasons.

Now, when the Trump Administration proclaimed the tax-exempt situation, the university undergoes anti-Semitism and campus unease. The left defends the administration to download voice laws aimed at ideological opponents.

‘Without the seller himself’: Columbia Student claims a classmate detained by ice

“The case of Bob Jones is a very precedent,” Joe Bishop-Henchman, Vice-President of the Tax Policy and Court of President of the President of the Cato Institute, Sacuent, Fox News Digital said.

“Bob Jones is difficult to win by Harvard. It would be easier if that case wasn’t, I think they say they are single, this is politics,” he said. “The administration can argue that it is to violate public policy, then the background Bob Jones follows.”

Today, the University of Bob Jones, the University of Liberal Liberal Liberal Arts in Greenville, has a student of students from South Carolina, more than 2,700. In 1983, he prohibited students and marriage among students who have violated this policy and policy. The IRS said for these discriminatory racism, the school did not qualify for the state of tax exception.

Trump admin requires US to cancel Harvard’s tax exception status

Trump Administration has announced that after Harvard University in grants and ice -zen $ 2 billion in contracts. (AP images)

The school argued that the revocation of the tax-exempt situation believes that he violated his religious freedom and was punished. However, the government informed that the organization should not be subsidized by tax breaks, established by public policy, especially against racism laws.

The Supreme Court governed 8 and 1 for the federal government in the case of the Reagag. Justice determined by the IRS that the tax-exempt situation should be denied to schools who practice racial discrimination against public policies. Even the school claimed religious freedom, to deal with racial discrimination was the “compelling interest of government”.

“That’s the letter of what Bob Jones said, but it may not be the only university,” Henchman said.

A drone view will voluntarily gathers the protestarium against Israel at the University of Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts, 14 May 2024. (Reuters / Brian Snyder TPX Day images)

The General Court was to receive a special tax situation supported by taxpayers “beneficial and stable effects of the tax situation”. Due to intercourse relationships, schools could not meet that standard.

Justice concluded that the discrimination of the Education Racia was encountered with a “Basic National National Policy”. While the religious beliefs of schools recognize that the Court has found religious freedoms that may limit religious freedoms when the “main interest of government” must be served in this case, prohibiting racial discrimination. The court has pointed out, “Not all burden on religion are constitutional.”

Click here to get Fox News app

Therefore, the Trump Administration must manipulate the manipulation of anti-Semitism on campus by maintaining the state of 501 (c) (3) tax. The IRS is expected to take the final decision soon, according to a CNN report, which broke the story for the first time.