The rules of the Federal Appeal Court govern the unconstitutional California rear rear star-news.press/wp

The Federal Appeal Court ruled on Thursday that the first law of its kind in California requires weapons to submit to the background checks to purchase unconstitutional ammunition, declaring that it violates the right to a second amendment to carrying weapons.

In Resolution 2-1, the Court of Appeal in the ninth American district upheld a permanent judicial order for the minimum court to prevent the state from enforcement.

The judge of the department Sandra Ecotta said that the law “restricts” the right to preserve and bear weapons and that the state failed to prove that the law was consistent with the country’s historical traditions to regulate firearms as required under the US Supreme Court Resolution 2022, New York Venice and the Pistol against Bruin.

“By subjecting California to check the background to all ammunition purchases, the California ammunition verification system violates the basic right to retain and carry weapons,” Eicotta wrote.

California’s arms control law requires rear checks to buy ammunition

California Governor Gavin New Roosom, a democratic, said the ruling was a “slap in the face” of the efforts of Golden State officials to not restrictions on armed violence.

“The strong arms laws save lives – and today’s decision is a slap in the face of the progress made by California in recent years to preserve its societies safer than armed violence,” Newsum newspaper said in a statement. “California residents have voted to request rear tests on ammunition and their voices should be important.”

“Our families, our schools and our neighborhoods deserve nothing less than the most basic protection against armed violence that can be prevented, and we are looking into our legal options,” said State Prosecutor Rob Punta, who is also a democratic.

California voters agreed to make a 2016 poll asking weapons owners to undergo initial background checks to buy ammunition, in addition to buying ammunition permits for a period of four years.

Later on the procedure to require rear tests for each ammunition purchase.

California officials said they had received 191 reports last year on “armed and prohibited individuals” who were banned through background tests from the purchase of ammunition.

The Court of Appeal in the ninth American Chamber has supported a permanent order for the judge of the lower court to prevent the state from enforcing the law. (Reuters/Ping Joan)

The state can ask the 11 judges ’court appeal committee or the US Supreme Court to review the decision.

Among the prosecutors was Kim Road, who won three Olympic gold medals in the shooting events, and the California Association of Venice and the pistol.

The head of the weapons group and the General Adviser said in a joint statement that the decision was a victory over “overcoming control of government weapons”, while Road described him as a “great victory for all arms owners in California.”

The irritable order was issued by the American boycott judge, Roger Benitez, in San Diego. The Court of Appeal Committee placed a judicial order during the California appeal.

California argued that many old firearms restrictions supported background examination, including the rules of the colonial era that require licenses to produce gunpowder, disarming around 1776 of people who rejected the “right of loyalty” and the nineteenth century rules that require the government’s approval of reduced weapons.

“Excessive” ammunition sales aim

California Governor Gavin New Noireh said the ruling was a “slap in the face” of the efforts made by Golden State officials to reduce armed violence. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File)

Click here to get the Fox News app

The judge of the department, Jay Bibi, who opposed a decision on Thursday, accused the majority of ignoring the directives of the Supreme Court by effectively announcing any restrictions on illegal ammunition sales, given that the state may indicate its similar historical counterparts.

Bibi wrote that the law “is not a kind of heavy organization that restricts the right to preserve and endure weapons.”

All three judges were appointed to a committee on Thursday by Republican presidents, although those appointed to Democrats have a majority in the ninth circle.

Eikota and Baby were appointed by former President George W. Bush, while the judge of the department Bridge Bad, who joined a majority on Thursday, was appointed by President Donald Trump.

Reuters contributed to this report.