Vitalik Buterin proposes a pluralistic identity to protect privacy star-news.press/wp

Ethereum, co -founder of Vitalik Buterin, has sparked new concerns about how to manage identity in Blockchain space, and urged the encryption community to stay away from individual digital identity solutions.

In a blog publication published on June 28, Borin argued that zero knowledge technology (ZK) has greatly improved privacy protection. However, he indicated that he also provides new risks when applied to solid identity structures.

Aspects of the ZK ID Cabbed

ZK technology can allow individuals to verify personal features without detecting basic data, which is already used in various projects, including WorldCoin’s World ID.

However, Boterin warns that just wrapping hierarchy traditional identifiers in ZK evidence does not address the basic weaknesses of identity systems.

He pointed out that one of the main risks of this system is to push for a “one -identity for a person”. According to Burin, this design can strip the benefits of the pseudonym and open the door to coercion.

“The practical level of the borrowed absorption that you get is reasonably less than the current situation today, and so on under the person’s personal identifier, even if it is wrapped in ZK, we risk near a world in which all your activity should be actually under one general identity.” He said.

The co -founder of Ethereum also highlighted practical restrictions, such as the deficiency of the identification of the government to cover individuals. In addition, biometric identions can be fake or abuse easily, especially in high risk environments.

In extreme cases, warning that hostilities can make identities to disrupt decentralized systems.

Burin provides a case of pluralistic identity

To face these issues, Burin proposes a “pluralistic identity” framework that prefers flexibility and decentralization. This model does not depend on one salad or a form of verification.

“Through” pluralistic identity “, I mean an identity system in which there is no single dominant issuance authority, whether it is a person, an institution or a platform.

Ethereum co -founder indicated that pluralistic identity can take two forms. The first is explicit, as the identity depends on the confidence of society, such as a network of peer testimonies.

Projects such as circuits use this method, allowing users to each other based on joint networks.

Meanwhile, the second model is implicit, as people can access services through a variety of login methods, such as email service providers, social media accounts or national identifiers. Both sins aim to avoid excessive dependence on any form of identity.

Borin says this pluralistic approach is more flexible.

In this scenario, a person who has a damaged biometric features may still have a passport, and there may still be a person without government documents verifying his identity through community testimonies.

However, this feature disappears when one system becomes dominant.

“The biggest risk that can come from the identity systems that are trying to be” global “: if its share in the market is approaching 100 %, it transforms the world from the pluralistic identity into one model of the person, which has worse characteristics,” Burin wrote.

In the end, Burin’s invitation to work is clear. Instead of searching for a global digital identifier, the encryption community must enhance systems that adopt complexity, repetition and the choice of the user.

He believes this is the only realistic way to maintain privacy and integration into decentralized ecosystems.