Washington – Two Upper Democrats in the Home Judicial Committee launched an investigation into the judicial department for the rejection attempt Prosecution against Mayor New York Eric Adams.
In a letter Procurely the General Attorney Pam Bondi on Sunday, Rek. Jamie Raskin Crocket Texas and Jasmine accused the judicial department for the attempted concealment of the alleged QUID Pro Quo to discharge the corruption accusation against ADAMS if he helped Trump administration in the implementation of his immigration policies.
“Last month, worrying reports on the request of the Trump Administration were to move to a serious public accusation of Eric Adams as part of the mounds of loyal assistance in the implementation of the administration’s mass arrest and deportation,” the letter said.
“Not only did the Ministry of Justice (doj) try to conduct the prosecutors in his career to behave on the EMIL BOVE lawyer, destroying the evidence and relating to the career prosecutors who refused to follow his illegal and unethical order,” he continued. “We write to ask you to immediately put on the end and retaliation and give documents and information about these disturbing accounts to the congress.”
Adams, Democrat, is charged at five points in September, including acceptance of bribes, conspiracy and a violation of the campaign financing. They were accused of accepting illegal campaign donations, flight upgrades and other travel benefits of Turkish officials and other foreign nationals in exchange for political favorists. He pleaded not guilty of all charges.
In February, Bove directed Federal prosecutors in New York to emit the case of corruption, stating Adams’s ability “restricted” to help Trump administration to implement their immigration policies.
Shifting to discharge costs is prompted resignation From Manhattan’s Federal Prosecutors Danielle Sassoon, who said that the request set up thoughtful dismissal dismissal with my abilities and duties to prosecute federal crimes without fear or affection and the advancement of the arguments of good faith before the courts. ”
“It is a beautiful and dangerous precedent of opportunistic and folding advantages and transferring immigration and other political issues with the dismissal of the criminal indictment. Nor will the Court likely to determine that such irregular exchanges is in accordance with the public interest,” Sassoon wrote.
Charges still to be formally rejected.
In his letter to the Ministry of Justice, Raskin and Crockett said that the department “wandered away from their principles of equal justice by law, rejecting severe criminal public corruption in exchange for help in the IMICIAL HOUSE.”
“Unfortunately, this is another trump doj that enables criminals to attack police officers, sold drugs in the community, or are corrupt politicians – until the criminals advocated the loyalty to the President Adut.” They wrote.
MPs have requested that the Ministry of Justice concludes notes relating to the meeting on 31. January between the Federal Prosecutors and Adams lawyers and asked if any of the documents were destroyed. They also requested that communications by the White House and Justice and the judiciary associated with the investigation in Adams. They gave Bondi within 17. March.
But break and crockett, who are in the minority party, have a limited government to take action against the judiciary if their demands are denied.
2025-03-03 19:11:00
