Donald Trump hit by Major Dei legal assignment star-news.press/wp

The US Judge Baltimore Adam Abelson has approved a preliminary ban on a large extent that was largely blocked by the President Donald Trump shortly after his inauguration prohibited by the programs of diversity, capital and inclusion (DEI) within the Federal Government.

Newsweek He contacted the White House for a commentary to a comment on Saturday via e-mail outside regular working hours.

Why is it important

Trump sought to radically restructure the Federal Government from his inauguration on the 20th of January, by screaming what he viewed as discriminatory dei programs and ask for all consumption through the government efficiency (Doge).

However, the new administration has already suffered a number of legal impacts, with federal judges who blocked the doge to have access to the vault payment system. Older figures within the administration reacted to anger, potentially set phases for the main calculation between elements of the judiciary and the White House.

What to know

On Friday Judge Abelson approved a preliminary ban that prevents the Trump administration from abolishing or changing the contracts that believe they are related to dei. He came after Trump signed the executive order on his first day in the Office of the Federal Agency to terminate any contracts or grants in the capital “.

The case against the Trump Administration brought the city of Baltimore, together with numerous groups of higher education, who claimed that the president exceeded his authority and threatened the freedom of speech.

The President Donald Trump speaks during the Ceremonial curson for the US Secretary Commerce Howard Lutnick in the oval office of the White House in Washington, DC, 21. February 2025. Years.

Jim Watson / AFP / Getty

In his judgment, Abelson concluded Trump’s executive orders, which means that federal agencies and contractors would not have “no reasonable ways to know what, if nothing, can make their grants in accordance.”

Citirao je hipotetičke primjere učitelja koristeći savezni finansiranje kako bi podučavao o zakonima Jima Crow-a i građevinskog radnika koji ispunjavaju rupe u području sa malim primanjima i rekli da je nejasno da li bi to bilo nejasno da li bi to bilo nejasno da li bi to bilo vaguely. “

The decision on Friday will probably increase tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, with the Vice President of the JD, who previously claimed judges should not be able to “control the executive legitimate power”. Page Head Elon Musk invited the federal judge to be killed after temporarily blocking his agency to access the Vault Payment System.

What do people say

In his verdict, Abelson wrote: “White house and lawyer clearly presented the implementation of the different aspects of the J21 accounts, that views that are considered benefit or supporting, or deicit, the position of the government wants to punish and obviously try to shut down.

“The Supreme Court re-brought a clear time and time, the government cannot rely on the” threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion “to combat unwanted speech.”

Department of Justice Lawyer Pardus Gheibi said: “The government has no obligation to subsidize the prosecutor’s speech.”

What happens next

Abelson approved a preliminary ban on Friday on Friday, while the matter is further estimated, which means that the legal battle over federal dei financing will almost certainly continue.

With republicans who control both congress chambers, as well as the White House, the judiciary appeared as the probably the main block on their power, potentially asking future confrontation with trump card.

2025-02-22 12:00:00

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *