- Sky spends 238 million dollars annually, but the effect of growth is unclear.
- UNISWAP size has stopped since 2021, despite huge spending.
While DaOS is like Sky and AAVE (AAVE) Hundreds of millions Annually, the unip (UNI) witnessed that its commercial size has been stagnant since 2021.
The contrast is remarkable: even with the increase in DAO budgets and their spending in all fields, growth remains far from some of the biggest names in the area.
It seems that the capital alone will not lower it if you do not build the place of demand.
Senior speakers, different priorities
Sky leads the package amazing at the annual expenditures of $ 238.3 million, with the exception of symbolic incentives – more than 63.6 million dollars.
But what AAVE lacks in size, it can be said that it compensates for the temple: half of its budget exceeds concrete growth efforts – risk frameworks, technical promotions, and marketing.
According to the distinctive symbol information panel, growth alone Accounts Nearly $ 38 million annually.

Source: x
Is Daos spending on timing, or simply burning the runway?
Uniswap paradox
Perhaps you have set the early Defi era, but its trading volume Busty crawl Over the past four years, according to the data of the symbolic station.
Although it dominates the names of the names, the growth of the protocol stopped; In contrast to innovation that occurs on newer and faster chains.

Source: x
What if the uniswap was launched on Solana instead of Ethereum?
This default now carries a real weight. By surviving ETHEREUM, UISWAP may pay an invisible cost: low fees loss, faster implementation, and Solana user base is increasingly active.
Efficiency test
Is the annual SKY spending of $ 238 million-approximately $ 20 million per month-translated into TVL can be defended, active users, or the prolonged dominance in the long run?
AAVE, although much smaller, still allocates tens of millions to marketing, security and operations although it is already securing $ 40 billion in deposit. The largest part of its budget aims to grow, but the return on investment is still unclear.
It is no longer a matter of spending on growth, but spending to prove the return on investment. Efficiency, not the size of the cabinet, may appear as a specific measure of the success of the sustainable Dao.
Next: Bitcoin 58.8 % BEATS GOLD and S&P 500 Revenue – Why should investors take a note
https://ambcrypto.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Samyukhtha-23-1000×600.webp
2025-06-16 03:00:00