International IMF brackets to Bitcoin – Global Economic Standards have been repaired star-news.press/wp

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) used the employee’s blog on July 31 to say that the calm part loudly: Bitcoin now belongs to the world’s basic economic statistics. The publication – which was allocated to the United Nations Statistical Committee’s approval of the updated national account system (SNA) – is increasing that “Bitcoin, for example, has a concrete economic impact, including because it consumes large amounts of energy to produce them. However, it does not involve the creation of goods or services in the traditional sense, as it is not calculated in the gross local product.”

To fix this measurement gap, the compounds agreed to “classify some of the encryption assets as” non -financial financial assets “, which are reflected in the national wealth.” It is not a judgment of value about bitcoin; It is a decision to calculate it in the public budget used by governments. For once determined technology, its measurement along with the origins of the earth and soil accidents is the institutional recognition of the central granted language and the cabinet speaks.

Bitcoin is divided into the system

Social IMF Special Monetary mail He distilled the message in a way that was reinforced through BTC circles: “Bitcoin consumes a lot of electricity like Argentina, but it is not calculated in the gross domestic product because it does not create traditional goods or services.” This line restores the subject of the work of the former International Monetary Fund, which is framed by Bitcoin and AI as intense energy sectors that policy makers should understand, not ignore.

In 2024, the Fund Blog estimated that the BTC mining and data centers together used about 2 % of global electricity in 2022 and discussing politics tools – including Energy Tax – for emissions management; Many analysis summaries, based on the IEA expectations mentioned by the International Monetary Fund officials, describe a basic path of about 3.5 % by 2027. Whatever one thinks in the framework, the decisive point of markets is the statistical vision: once the activity is explicitly measured, it enters into a total conversation on assets, flows and external balances.

This vision is strengthened in external accounts. Bitcoin’s new Bitcoin’s new balance has statistics by tackling irresponsible transfers such as BTC such as transactions in “non -productive financial assets”, and cash, by identifying “verification services” as services.

The chapter draft provides examples of the explicit software conversion in which a user of miners or an auditor in Economy A is to be recorded as a border services trade. The annex on the changes from BPM6 explains that health verification payments are “registered … as cross -border transactions in the assets of the payable encryption … for the service product.” In practical terms, mining and mining for non -residents become exported in the service account, acquisitions and behaviors across the border across the capitalist account. This is not a simple change for a long cartoon sector like “Outside of Books”.

The original bitcoin sounds immediately confirmed. “This is actually a fairly great news – IMF is officially integrating Bitcoin into the International Development Form (The),” David Billy wrote, on the pretext that “the balance of trade, gross domestic product, (and) sovereign credit quality … will now include Bitcoin’s economic imprint.” Until it was reduced to its basics, the ready -made meals are clear: the macro gatekeeper will count what was invisible.

For Milan Greennic Jean Westfield researcher, the risks are human as statistical. BTC called “the most efficient tool available in converting energy into a lifeline for those who suffer under the policies imposed by the International Monetary Fund,” adding: “Nothing exceeds the energy rate to the Bitcoin boat.”

Daniel Patten, climate researcher Daniel Patten, was a direct goal in framing energy, describing “FUD” in the cry of a crowd – “the game on” – who talks about how to read this moment in Bitcoin: not with control, but as the basic asserted that the original has grown significantly to ignore it.

Perhaps the most inhabited reaction came from the sustainable bitcoin protocol, which has argued that the language seized by many-“intense energy”-raises the largest form of official integration. “It is understood that people feel uncomfortable that IMFNEWS says that Bitcoin is” intense “, but this is a positive moment in its victory!” The group wrote.

“The International Monetary Fund has been officially classified into BTC as a non -productive capitalist … Bitcoin is no longer invisible. Even the International Monetary Fund is forced to measure and report it. This is legitimacy. This is the vision. This is the total adoption.” Their thread reflects the BPM7 and SNA mechanics: Once bitcoin is registered as a capital and health verification activity is reserved as services, it is included in the balance of payments and national wealth statistics according to the design.

None of this means that the International Monetary Fund has not warned it of the sovereign bitcoin policy; This means that the fund is updating statistical plumbing while continuing to pressure the risk issue. Batten’s modern research claims that, in practice, the International Monetary Fund has hindered the nation -state dependence.

He refers to Al Salvador program with the International Monetary Fund, where the authorities committed “not to assemble more bitcoin at the total public sector level”, even when the National Bitcoin Office revealed additional purchases for “Bitcoin Strategic Reserve”.

Patten Pakistan also highlighted, where a wave of reports said in early July that the International Monetary Fund had rejected a plan to provide electricity supported for bitcoin mining and some intensive energy industries. Local ports and encryption described the proposal as prohibited on the foundations of the market and financial reasons with a financial risk, while the Energy Department in Pakistan and a quarter of the International Monetary Fund issued a denial that any official rejection had occurred.

The standards of standards were set on July 31, against the background of this policy, remaining unambiguously based on bitcoin. The International Monetary Fund Blog is making two important points for asset allocations. First, it confirms that the translators will classify “some of the assets of encryption” as “non -financial financial assets”, and bring them to the measured national wealth. Second, it refers to coordination with BPM7 so that the boundary flows and health verification service revenues are registered in a coherent way through external and national accounts.

At the time of the press, BTC was traded at $ 115,658.

Distinctive image created with Dall.e, Chart from TradingView.com

Editing process For Bitcoinist, it is focused on providing accurate, accurate and non -biased content. We support strict resource standards, and each page is subject to a diligent review by our team of senior technology experts and experienced editors. This process guarantees the integrity of our content, importance and value of our readers.