The Competition Office said Monday, online food delivery company Doordash and his believes because of consumers for consumers, he advertises them to a lower price than those who pay customers.
“A Bureau study found that consumers could not purchase food and other items in the advertised price for adding compulsory fees on Doordah’s websites and mobile application, Agency said the agency said.
“This practice is known as a drip price and is misleading, as consumers are not presented with the pre-pricing price.”
The Bureau presented a competition to the competition court, managing cases related to the Canadian competition laws.
Doorkash is looking for a result that would pay the penalty and compensates the affected customers, which refers to “misleading”.
Spokesperson Parker Dorlough has sent CBC news in an email statement due to transparency ‘main priority “and deceived Doordash to hide or deceive consumer rates.
“All DOABASH rates that support high-quality operations on our platform are clearly labeled and disclosure during the consumer application process – including the last review before payment,” the statement read.
“To be light crystal, Doordash hides or in any way badly hides. This application is an incorrect and excessive attempt at one of the main local trading platforms. Documentash distributes unfairly and defend against these claims.”
Travel booking industry for similar cases “good candidates”
Delivery services are “larger and larger pieces that interact with the economy, the Executive Director of the Canadian monopoly project.
“It is important that we have transparent competitions and prices in this field,” he stated that “medium-mid-man” businesses are like travel reservation and other delivery services – that they are “good candidates for these types of research.
Drant’s prices described the price of a product or service that does not have a very total price of price, hiding or delaying the company fees in the process of purchase to distort the real price.
The Competition Office would direct, but his rivals, others said that the laws of the competition often used to make an example of a company that are responsible for similar behaviors to make an example of a company.
The goal is to succeed in the office, “Other companies with similar practices … will see that and change their ways or faces in the future.”
2025-06-09 16:10:00
