Does the new recruitment policy in Coinbase contradict the US Federal Law? star-news.press/wp

Brian Armstrong’s latest announcement that Coinbase will begin to request personal guidance and restrict some roles for American citizens have been suspicious of whether the company’s new policies will violate the anti -discrimination laws.

In an interview with Beincrypto, a Coinbase spokesman explained that the company does not adopt the policy of “American citizens only”. The changes, which have been implemented to combat North Korean infiltrators, will only affect the roles that reach sensitive systems.

North Korea’s infiltration threat

Coinbase is preparing to adopt new radical security policies in response to an escalating threat from North Korean infiltrators.

CEO Brian Armstrong announced last week that the company will redirect its commercial operations towards the United States, which restricts some roles for American citizens only.

The new policies generate that all new appointments bring a personal orientation. In addition, employees who deal with sensitive systems will now be asked to be American citizens and undergo fingerprints.

Coinbase problem is far from a minor. A pioneering central exchange is a continuous goal for North Korean infiltrators. These actors have developed the state’s threats to their methods beyond traditional electronic attacks, and moved towards a more treacherous tactic: infiltration.

This new approach includes North Korean agents who apply for Web3 from the remote and roles of information technology in encryption companies. They use deceptive identities and advanced social engineering to earn a foothold from the inside, allowing them to implement huge thefts and return money to the system.

Despite the confidence of the situation, this advertisement sparked immediate controversy and a central legal question: Are these policies violating, especially citizenship requirements, anti -American discrimination laws?

Can Coinbase defend their measures under the current law?

At first glance, it appears that the new Coinbase policy is directly inconsistent with the US federal law.

The Immigration and Nationality Law (INA) generally prohibits the discrimination of employers on the basis of a person’s nationality or migration.

Given that the system is designed to ensure fair treatment of American citizens, permanent population, number, and refugees, the rule of “American citizens only” is likely to be for all jobs illegal.

However, INA does not recognize several crucial exceptions. For example, federal law can allow employers to reject opportunities for individuals who do not meet the specific national security requirements. This rule often applies to roles that require an official security permit or access to classified information.

Export control laws also prevent sensitive technology from falling into the wrong hands. A tougher control of these, international traffic regulations in weapons (ITAR), military and defense materials related to defense. The bases of the broader export management regulations (EAR) cover the elements of “double use” with commercial and military applications.

These laws do not impose citizenship employment. However, the company can make it easier for an American citizen and avoid the complex process of obtaining a special government license to share technology with non -Americans.

Finally, the company may be legally needed to employ only American citizens for certain roles under a federal contract.

The basic legal puzzle of Coinbase remains whether it can successfully argue that its security -based measures fall within one of these permissible exceptions or whether his approach puts a dangerous precedent for the technology industry.

A targeted policy, not a comprehensive ban

The initial news of the Coinbase announced speculation that it adopts the policy of employing a “American citizen only” at the company level, which would directly violate federal law.

However, a spokesman for this narration in the e -mail exchange that Beincrypto had with Coinbase.

“We are not adopting the US employment policy at the company’s level only … These changes will primarily affect employees in roles with access to sensitive systems and Coinbase roles are still open to qualified candidates regardless of citizenship,” said Beincrypto.

This distinction indicates that the company does not depend on a specific federal list to justify its policy. In fact, a spokesman for the new security measures of Coinbase explained to benefit from any legal exceptions established by US federal law.

Coinbase said: “This is not related to the call/EAR or the creation of restrictions based on citizenship. The changes in the discussion are related to adding new guarantees in the stop stage, things such as checking personal identity, fingerprints, and guidance, to reduce risks from malicious actors,” said Coinbase.

Regarding the personal mandatory approach, Coinbase explained that these events will occur in the regional centers of non -American employees.

Although Coinbase apparently avoids the most pronounced legal spoils, it works on adventure in a new and non -tested gray area.

Beyond employment: workforce protection

Coinbase’s position depends on the argument that the threat of North Korean actors is so severe that it requires a procedure that may be considered otherwise. It is mainly betting that the court finds that the logical security basis is convincing enough to excel the discrimination.

When defending its position, Coinbase set its new standards in the context of a broader transformation in the sector.

“Given the high fraudulent requests and malicious actors trying to infiltrate technology companies, we expect proof of the existence of stronger proof and limited personal requirements more common throughout the industry,” Coinbase spokesman told Beincrypto.

To complete this broader trend to verify the most striking identity, the company has also implemented a multi -layer security approach to combat internal weaknesses.

“We are facing the dangers of threats from the inside seriously, including the possibility of external coercion or bribery attempts. Our approach includes technical monitoring, background examination, mandatory security training, moving forward, and stronger guarantees on board,” added.

By showing that its policies deal with both new appointments and current employees, Coinbase sets their standards not discriminatory, but as a comprehensive reaction to the threat that federal law may not expect it completely.

Coinbase as a test of the encryption industry

The debate on Coinbase’s policy is a greater struggle facing the entire industry. With the growth of the actors sponsored by the state and the malicious groups more sophisticated, companies are forced to adopt security measures that break down the lines between traditional employment practices and national security.

Given its wide arrival, Coinbase’s response is likely to put these threats. The question is no longer whether the company is able to employ a non -citizen.

It also involves walking on a legal and moral rope to protect itself and its customers from these advanced attacks.

Although Coinbase has defended its actions, it is still unclear whether its model will set a new standard for industry or to be the first test in a new era of legal battles.

The post does the new recruitment policy in Coinbase contradict the US Federal Law? He first appeared on Beincrypto.

[og_img]

2025-08-27 22:03:00