Starmer says American Backstop is needed for a peace offer in Ukraine star-news.press/wp

Sir Keir Starmer said that any Ukrainian peace offer would require the “American return space” to deter Russia to attack the neighbor again.

Speaking after hectic maturation with European leaders in Paris, the Prime Minister reiterated that he would consider the deployment of military troops in Ukraine in the event of a permanent peace agreement.

But he said that the “American security guarantee was the only way to fully deter Russia” and promised to discuss “the key elements” of the U.S. President Donald Trump when they met in Washington next week.

Sir Keir said that Europe will “have to defend the continent in the face” Generational “safety challenge Russia posira.

He was eager to avoid explaining exactly what he meant by “Backstop” – but his allies suggest that this could include air support, logistics and intelligent possibilities.

European leaders convened in the Élysé Palace to discuss concerns the decision of the Trump Administration to initiate peacekeeping talks with Russia – due to the beginning in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday – Sam.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Kyiv did not know about talks and would not recognize any contracts achieved without his involvement.

U.S. officials suggested that European people would be consulted about peace talks with Russia, but not directly involved in them.

The Paris Summit was also held for days after the US Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegset, said Europe must be primarily responsible for guaranteeing their own safety that goes forward.

In his statement to journalists after the conversation, Mr. Keir said that the United States did not leave us “, but that it was” time to take responsibility for our safety, our continent. “

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that the transatlantic relations were in the “new phase”, and that the meeting confirmed that the time has occurred to “much larger ability for Europe to defend.”

Sir Keir indicated that any corporate troop contributions from Great Britain would be part of the multinational force for the police border between Ukrainian and Russian territory.

But experts say it would effectively effectively be a huge venture that would require a major increase in defense consumption.

Malcolm Chalmers, Deputy Director for the Royal United Institute, said that, unlike UN peacekeepers to respect, if the force that was proposed is intended to deter Russian attacks, “it is the entire thing completely.”

“You need vericult, well-armed forces – and you don’t just need forces of Frontline, the security forces and air force and so far,” he said. “That’s a much greater question.”

General Sir Adrian Bradshaw, a former NATO Commander, said, “It can’t be a force token, there can be something that notes bad behavior and stands on the page.”

He said in the world of the BBC to the one to do so “effective what NATO works on his own lawn – really deterres to aggression”, and will be “supported by a great strategy for Russia” which would be clearly the future conflict would not be contained In Ukraine.

“In essence, force should be big enough to beat the intrusion,” he added.

The former head of the British Army, Lord Danatt, previously estimated such force would need about 100,000 soldiers – from the Great British that contributes to about two fifths.

“We just didn’t get that number,” he said on Saturday, adding that the army in shape would be done to get this role to come to a significant cost.

The UK currently consumes about 2.3% of its overall economic outcome on defense. The government has committed to increasing defense consumption to 2.5%, but did not say when it would be achieved.

Mr. Keir told reporters that the government would go out the road to fulfill 2.5% of the commitment after completing his strategic defense overview.

“The part of my message to our European Allied is that we all have to step up for both the ability and consumption and financing,” he said.

“That includes the UK, which is why I committed to spend more.”

Some European figures signaled their agreement with it.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said that Europe had to “reinforce” the consumption of the defense and support of Ukraine, because “Russia is threatening all over Europe now, while the president of the European Commission in Ursula von der Leyen invited to” rush “in defense consumption.

Sir Keir also joined in Paris by the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands, as well as the President of the European Council and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

Before the meeting, European leaders also expressed concerns after Hegseth that Ukraine would be expected to return to their election boundaries – before Russia attached the forced masters and heathen in its 2022. Years Invasion.

Hegseth also reduced the appearance of Ukraine, which joined the Union of Mutual Defense NATO – something Mr. Keir said it was in a “irreversible” path to.

Gen Sir Bradshaw noticed these potential concessions in Russia and said: “If we can’t return Ukraine to what’s like a sovereign nation before this war, we absolutely had to make lasting peace.”

No 10 has not confirmed Sir Keir’s trip in Washington early on Monday, after The Minister said that the United Kingdom could serve as a “bridge” between the US and Europe.

The BBC understands that the Prime Minister is offered to host monitoring the meeting of the European leaders after Washington excursions.

Poland Tusk has already indicated that his nation would not be sent by troops in Ukraine, but would still support military, financial and humanitarian aid.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, told reporters after the Paris Meetings discussed by sending troops in Ukraine currently “completely too early” and was “a little irritated” with the topic.

Governments in the UK claim that “not a surprise,” there was a difference in the opinion between the leaders, without any nation ready to show their hand quite.

British diplomats do not believe that every nation will need to commit to contribution to troops – but some would. And regardless of the eventual role in Europe, American involvement should still be needed.

Prof Chalmers said, “Having a significant number of NATO troops on the Ukrainian soil would be a failure of Russia, so I was hard to see that Russia accepts such presence as part of the deal.”

The introduction of British troops would also require parliamentary approval, some Lib Dem leader, Mr. Ed Davey said they were sure that “all sides of the house would probably agree.”

The spokesman, Mr. Keir, said that the parliament would be consulted “as needed”, but that was “approaching the debate” with other world leaders.

Meanwhile, the fight on the field in Ukraine continued over the weekend, and at least three civilians were killed in Russian strikes on Sunday, towards local authorities.

Several areas of Ukraine are found in emergencies after an attack on energy infrastructure, while the Russian Ministry of Defense stated that it was intercepted on Sunday night and destroyed 90 Ukrainian drones.