Do the Ministry of Justice pursue the storm witnesses? star-news.press/wp

The Roman Storm team, the founder of Roman Storm, is on foot in the foot, where another major witness decided to give up fifth place. Court correspondents claimed that the jury appeared “sunken” in the remaining heavy terminology certificate.

As the trial continues, it appears that the largest victories of the Ministry of Justice came from the disruption of the list of witnesses in the storm. The appointed appointed Trump explicitly appointed the rules that the storm is allegedly violated, and may hinder the prosecution strategy.

The cash trial continues the hurricane

The trial of Tornado Cash Roman Storm entered the trial third The week today, and finally the defense has a chance to take the initiative. However, he faced a large setback as one a witness From the series of behaviors, it announced its intention to call for the fifth. Apparently, this person changed her melody after a phone call from public prosecutors, which raised a great warning.

This is especially worrying because the Roman storm confirmed last month that the Ministry of Justice systematically undermines its witnesses. Last week, the prosecutors suggested providing charges against many individuals at Dragonfly Capital, who is publicly administrative partner Mockery This is as a step to prevent hurricane criticism witnesses. Why does this claim do this?

Journalist Molly White Proposal This step is a major contradiction at the heart of the Tornado Cash case. Since President Trump took office, the encryption application has become more friendly in the United States. The new deputy public prosecutor at the Ministry of Justice, Todd Blanche, wrote a note in April, apparently the case against the Roman storm:

“Prosecutors should not charge the charges of organizational violations in cases that involve digital assets, including, but not limited to, transferring unlicensed money … unless there is evidence that the defendant is aware of the requirements for licensing or registration in the case and violates such a condition books.

The Ministry of Justice has dropped a lot of its complaint against the storm after this memorandum, which greatly complicates the prosecution strategy. So far, the federal government has put the alleged penetration victims on the platform, but it is not sure how Tornado Cash connects to actual financial crimes. Beyond this movements, it seems that pushing the storm witnesses to retreat seem to be the main prosecution tactic.

What will the jury decide?

However, even if this generates a lot of anger In the encryption community, it may not be ineffective. Contact the Tornado Cash team Witnesses To the platform today, one of them, the co -founder of Naxo Matthew Edman, spent a greater time in the certificate.

numerous court Correspondence The jury’s reaction to addiction was documented: His leadership of technical information was “especially strong”, but the jury seemed “bored”, “steeped”, and “sag” as a reaction to the heavy debate. It seems that the Ministry of Justice is actively a job To ensure that the jury does not contain anyone who understands Blockchain technology.

All this means, that the Tornado Cash issue can go in either direction now. Even if society recognizes many incidents, the jury may not notice them. Whatever happens, encryption enthusiasts must track procedures, as they may specify the privacy law in the future.