California could prohibit LED from public schools star-news.press/wp

California Democrats push the account that would prevent federal immigration authorities from accessing public schools without an order or court.
Newsweek He contacted Governor Gavin Newtoom and Office of the Republic Minority Minority Brian Jones to comment.
Why is it important
This move is an offer to strengthen protection for immigrant and family students in the middle of the meeting of the President Donald Trump.
The Homeland Insurance Department issued a note in January, which annulled the policy ban on the business-duty or close to schools, churches and other “sensitive locations.”
Politika, introduced in 2011 by Memorandum for 2011. year, then director John Morton, requested agents to receive prior approval before they were arrested in sensitive locations.
This policy remained in force throughout the entire entire entire Trump administration and continued under the President Biden.
In a statement regarding the movement of politics, the DHS spokesman said that “criminals will no longer be able to hide in American schools and churches to avoid arrest.”
Concerns are set among the communities of immigrants on the safety and well-being of students under new politics.
Mandel I / AFP
What to know
State President Senate approved Bill, which was introduced to State Senator Lena Gonzalez, D-Long Beach, with a 6-1 voice last Wednesday.
Bill 48 prohibits school districts, county offices of education and charter schools to assign immigration authorities access to school campuses without a valid judicial order or a judicial order. This measure aims to prevent unauthorized actions for the implementation of immigration within educational settings.
The draft law prohibits and detect student records or personal data for immigration authorities without proper legal approval, ensuring the confidentiality and security of students and their families.
Legislation says: “It would forbade school districts, county ordinations and their staff to assign a permit for the immigration authority in the school place, except that the immigration body does not constitute a valid judicial order or forensic order”.
California schools are prohibited collection of information or data on immigration students or their families and cannot reveal student records without consent or court order.
If the account passes, it would be further restricted by the ability of federal officials to access student information or get entry into school campuses.
The bill is harmonized with the status of California as a State of Shrine, and strengthening protection to undocumented immigrants and the goal is to mitigate fears that can interfere with the student’s approach to educators. If passed, the SB 48 would send a message to the Trump Administration on the state’s commitment to protect its immigrant communities.
What do people say
Gonzalez said in a statement: “The U.S. Supreme Court has long determined that the Constitution guarantees the right to education regardless of immigration status, and until recently the federal government treated these sensitive spaces as safe zones.”
“Immigration actions near schools have a cold effect on school attendance, increased loss of learning and harming student mental health.”
California state supervisor of the public instruction Tony Thurmond It was said in the post on X: “It is my pleasure to launch the Senator Lena Gonzalez to protect my children in school. Our laws that can cost all children without fear. Thank you to the Senators for taking this important measure of the education committee.”
What happens next
The SB 48 will move on to the Voting Senate, which requires most of two thirds. If approved, the account will be relocated to the Assembly for further consideration before being sent to the Gavin Newtomi Governor Rate to the end authorization.
2025-04-07 11:59:00