Disclosure: The opinions and opinions expressed here only belong to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of the liberto.news.
ETHEREUM (ETH) stands at a crossroads. In short, the evidence of zero knowledge, or ZKPS, is scheduled to become the backbone of the Blockchain future to maintain privacy, with estimates expected 90 billion evidence created annually by 2030. However, the main Ethereum series, even with its remarkable development, cannot simply deal with this flood. Gas costs and space restrictions make the onchain realization completely, such as trying to contain the ocean through straw.
Just as the availability of alternative data, or DA appeared for a short period, layers such as Celestia appeared and benefit to solve the scaling problems in ETAREUM a few years ago, we now need ways to verify ZK alternative to keep pace with this inserted tsunami. History suggests that pragmat will prevail.
ZKP explosion is coming, and Ethereum is not ready
Zero knowledge has moved beyond specialized technology to become a major column for Blockchain privacy and expansion capacity. From ZK-Rollups that operate a highly productive layer to DAPPS that focuses on privacy, ZKPS includes itself in the web3 texture. Research from protocol laboratories Estimates By 2030, the number of ZK evidence created a balloon can be 90 billion annually as the ZK use multiply, such as proving the customer side on phones or the AI -driven DEFI protocols. These are not speculation. They are forecasts based on accelerating ZK technology adoption.
Here’s rubbing: Currently, ethereum cannot keep up with this request. If each ounce of its capacity is devoted to -30 million invasive units per block-to check the ZKPS (assuming 200,000 gas per guide), it can deal with approximately 150 million evidence per year with a semi-full mass area. This is less than 0.2 % than 90 billion expected.
Even if you do half the estimate, the L1 of Ethereum is not enough for this task in its current form. Gas prices will rise, which converts the verification of proof into a few luxury that it can bear. While there are plans to improve the network as an encryption environment, the ETHEREUM road is slowly moving, and it may take years. We need a better solution to deal with the incoming flood.
The cradle of Alt Da, the road, and the verification of the proof of ZK can be followed
Ethereum faced the scaling crises before, and the community may adapt. A few years ago, rollups emerged as a life line, but it hit the bottleneck: providing data. The deployment of the L1 transaction data from ETHEREUM was expensive and ineffective, threatening to strangle L2 growth. Society was divided – doctors insisted that everything remains security for security, while the pragmatists pushed the alternative DA layers. Then projects such as Celestia and Divel intervened, as Blockchains provided dedicated to dealing with data storage costs outside the chain and reducing size costs. Despite the early decline, Alt Da is now an integral part of the ETAREUM road map and its adoption by the Rollups and RAAS providers alike.
ZK ProOof Verification faces a similar turning point. Stopgap reflects today, assembly proof, AIDS tools for the pre -DA era. The compounds collect hundreds of proofs in one “super guide” to check ETHEREUM, which reduces costs but inserting cumin. Some payments take hours or even a day for stability, and they are far from the final promises of ZK-Lollups. Worse than that, users in these compounds, who often lack the game – should not be confident in the game – not amazing symbols, so there is no discount of misconduct.
It is a fragile basis for an unreliable ecosystem. That is why alternative verification layers, such as ZKVERIORIORII, offer a Blockchain -based alternative: fast, cheap, and believing through lead proof incentives. Parallel to Alt Da is not just a speech – it has been proven that it is working.
The cost of commitment to the current situation
Without checking an alternative evidence, the future looks dark. Check Groth16 One guide On ETHEREUM, today it can cost $ 10 at moderate gas prices (30 GWEI, $ 1500 ETH). Beat 90 billion, and you are looking at a trillion dollar problem by 2030-a futility that Blockchain cannot maintain.
Even with assembly, the costs remain volatile when connected to the gas market in Ethereum, and the case of cumin undermines highly productive cases such as Defi in actual time or games. Ansaro claims that checking the test outside the series sacrifice safely, but they overlook the concessions that were already made: confidence in the compounds without any share, or converting stark evidence to extraction for the Ethereum consensus, which adds the complexity and cost.
Compare this with a standard approach. The custom verification chain can reduce costs by 90 %, while avoiding ETHEREUM gas and supporting the original blatant verification. It is not only about savings. It comes to opening innovation. For example, the customer’s side can be proof (where users create evidence on their devices) if the bottleneck verification is not. Imagine billions of phones that start from ZKPS for private identity or micro transactions; This is what enables him by the customer. ETHEREM cannot host this tip, but the ALT check layer can.
Overcoming Purist reaction
Ethereum community frequency is not new. When Alt Da appeared for the first time, critics cried wrongly, claiming that it mitigate L1 security. However, the sky did not fall. Rollups flourished, fees decreased, and the ecological system of ETAREUM. ZK skeptical echo today: “The verification of Ethereum should remain for no confidence.” But confidence is not dual. The compounds already make TRST assumptions, and the restrictions of ethereum premomombile also force the barters. The ZKP proof verification chain provides distinctive symbols and discounts provided by accountability complexes. It is not a step from Ethereum Aman – it’s a side step specifically designed for the unique ZK demands.
The early Vitalik Buterin’s writings on ZK-Snarks expected its dominance, and expected that the ZK-Rollups would eventually outperform. He was right in technology. Now it’s time to expand its scope. Dencun (EIP-4844) has proven that Ethereum can develop with standard solutions; DA costs dramatically reduce the costs of DA. Alt Zk Prooof checking the next logical step, in line with the long -term ETHEREUM vision.
An invitation to work before hitting the wave
ZKP wave is coming, whether we are ready or not. If the deadly application raises great dependence, such as a social network reserved for privacy or a trading platform driven by artificial intelligence, the ETHEREUM will be confused under the download of the guide.
We cannot wait for a crisis before taking action. Zk alternative ZK verification layers have become a necessity, and the first engines like Zkverify already build them. The ethereum community should give up nostalgia for homogeneous designs and embrace unity, just as I did with Da.
By 2030, 90 billion evidence can redefine Web3, open privacy, efficiency, and scale. But only if we behave now. Let’s not repeat the nightmares of crowding yesterday. Verify the Proof Proof is not just a solution – it’s the future that Ethereum deserves.
https://crypto.news/app/uploads/2025/06/crypto-news-Alt-ZK-solutions-can-save-Ethereum-option01.webp
2025-06-22 08:51:00