Doubts about the crystal palace stand out in the European involvement in football star-news.press/wp

The European League of Crystal Palace has achieved an important obstacle for UEFAs by risking European dream. Miguel Delaney reported that John Textor is an American company in the heart of the subject, 43% in the Kristal Palace and 88% control of Olympique Lyon. Another club that is qualified for the Europa League. UEFA rules prohibit the two clubs involved in the same competition or organizations with the aim of avoiding conflicts of interest in the whole of the tournament.

Steve Parish, President of Crystal Palace and the public face of the club, made UEFA lobby, that the palaces should not participate in the multi-club structure. The parish emphasized that the role of the text club is not a crucial impact. Despite the high equality participation of the text, the power of voting within the club is limited to 25%, which are generally lined with the parish of Josh Harris and David Blitzer.

The text publicly stated the absence of frustration control. Despite the certifications, the UEFA’s main concern is not in perception rather in legal formal documents that define property and control. This severe evidence can be done against the palace.

This case, as it may be complex and legalist, is a symbolic moment in modern football. It explains how romantic success stories are like Crystal Palace, becoming weaker and weaker the transformation of the sport becoming a global business company. Outstanding club season – Overcome expectations and earn a precious place in Europe. Now, it does not have poor risks or scandals, according to government failures and legal techniques. The harsh irony has long been a club associated with gritty resilience and culture of real fans.

Fans have already had problems before. Over a year ago, supporters of palace supporters were displaced in the banners in Selhurst Park a desozing and directly criticized club ownership. These early warnings were largely ignored rather than based on short-term profits rather than fulfillment. Now, it has increased with the UEFA examination, the consequences of this neglect can be serious.

According to current reports, the Palace lost the key to placing the March of the club in a blind confidence – the administrative movement that can solve this situation. Evangelos Marininsas used this method with the forest Nottingham to avoid similar conflict between the forest and Olympiakos. Not acting on the palace’s decision in time, proves that it is expensive to tempt the fate before the Qualification of Europe, which is expensive.

Under this drama is a wider crisis in the football government. The sport is with examples of fragmented and reactive regulations than proactive than policies. Multi-club ownership now includes more than 400 clubs of more than 150 property networks around the world. Despite the scale of this development, the FIF has never clearly defined what is “club” in regulators. Without the definition of established, enforcement becomes blurry and inconsistent. Many industries have criticized UEFA manipulation of these issues without transparency and favores the richest clubs.

In fact, some suggest that the palace is suffering because there is not among the European elites. The feeling is that the renowned clubs rarely harm these types of problems. The European Club Association (ECA), the President of PSG directs Nasser Al-Khelaifi, represent the largest clubs of continents and their interests. In contrast, the Parish has participated in the European Union of Clubs (UEC), which are excluded from the elite decision-making circles. Some people see this political dynamic as another layer of spreading palace problems.

The consequences of this case go beyond only one club. It is a symbol of current football contradictions: a global game about local identity, now governs the financial and legal frameworks that collide with club traditions. Clubs like Strasbourg and Troyes currently have a multi-club system under large entities like Chelsea or the city football team, they have lost efficiently. They offer strategic objectives of the parent club, usually the richest and most prominent structure. The worry is that the original spirit of football, unpredictable, unpredictable, eroding in favor of non-profit structures.

Crystal Palace Europa League title could be one of the great modern football stories: a club challenges probabilities and breaking continental competitions. Instead, the story of the current account has become the consequences of unregulated property models and UEFA delays framework rules. The UEFA is still expected to receive vision lenient, perhaps a unique situation or actual control text exercises to recognize. However, despite authorizing the palace to compete, the clouds on the achievement remains a reflection of the success in the modern game.

This situation emphasizes the urgent need for reform. The football authorities must clarify the rules of property and must be made quite and consistently. Clubs must take greater responsibility to meet governance standards. And fans – Voices warns that result in a long time, they need to be more significant in the management of clubs that support. As the palace waits for excitement, their case is as warning and rallying as weep.

As a result, Europe League expectations of the Crystal Palace are at risk, a model that has grown faster than the rules designed to hold. Football government bodies unless it is crucial and transparency, similar stories like the palace will be more common, and will be even greater extent.