Nail Funds – Copyright Settlement for $ 1.5 billion

About half a million books will be qualified to obtain a day of payment at least $ 3000, thanks to a historic settlement of $ 1.5 billion in a collective lawsuit filed by a group of authors against man.

This historical settlement determines The largest payments In the history of the law of copyright in the United States, but this is not a victory for authors – it is another victory for technology companies.

Technology giants are competing to collect as much written materials as possible for LLMS training, which operate basically chat products such as ChatGPT and Claud Milquetoast. This AIS can become more advanced when you absorb more data, but after the entire internet scrape, these companies are literally Running New information.

That is why Antarbur, the company behind Claude, millions of books pulled fromShadow librariesAnd feed them in artificial intelligence. This special lawsuit, Partz against manIt is one of the dozens raised against companies like Meta, Google, Openai and Midjourney On the legitimacy of artificial intelligence training on copyright works.

But the book does not get this settlement because their work was fed to artificial intelligence – it is just a costly slap on the wrist for the anthropologist, and it is a company that just rises Last 13 billion dollarsBecause the books were illegally downloaded instead of buying them.

In June, Federal Judge William Al Sap Aside It was eliminated that it is legal, in fact, to train artificial intelligence on copyright -protected materials. The judge argues that this issue of use is “transformative” sufficiently to be protected through the doctrine Not updated Since 1976.

The judge said: “Like any reader who aspires to be a writer, LLMS of Anthropor has been trained in action to race forward, repeat or replace it – but to transfer a solid angle and create something different.”

It was the piracy – not to train artificial intelligence – that transferred Judge Alsup to bring the case to the trial, but with the settlement of man, the trial is no longer necessary.

“Today’s settlement, if approved, the remaining old claimants will be resolved,” Aparna Sridhar, Deputy General Adviser to Anthropor said in a statement. “We are still committed to developing safe systems of artificial intelligence that helps people and organizations to extend their capabilities, enhance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems.”

Since the additional dozens about the relationship between artificial intelligence and the work of copyrights go to court, judges now have Bartz V. Anthropic to refer to a predecessor. But given the repercussions of these decisions, another judge may have a different conclusion.