Some American allies are considering scaling the intelligence that divided with Washington in response to the reconciliation approach to Trump’s Administration Russia, four sources with direct knowledge about discussions relating to NBC news.
Allies weigh a move due to concerns about the protection of foreign funds whose identities could inadvertently be involuntary, the sources involved a foreign official.
Each intelligence agency treats its obligations of foreign agents as Sacract, advocating to keep agents safe and protect their identities. Everything that jeopardized that the obligation could violate that trust, former officials said, and that could lead to some spyware to keep some exchange of information with Washington.
Allies, including Israel, Saudi Arabia and members of so-called spy eyes, examine how they can require current intelligence exchange protocols to heat the Trump Administration with Russia, Sources said
“These discussions are already happening,” said the source with direct knowledge about discussions.
However, no decision or action was made, the sources said.
The overview is part of a broader testing of the relationship with Washington among many American allies, including diplomacy, trade and military cooperation, as well as intelligent things, sources said.
Historical implications
Although the scope of American policy change towards Russia has remained unclear, the Allies weigh the possible implications of what could be historically removed, the Western official said.
Asked about the allies “may limit what they share with the United States, the Hyth Spokesman for the Homemade Security Council has been announced that the President Donald Trump is” obvious “about the opponents of America.
“The United States has unsurpassed intelligent opportunities that are precisely because there are initiatives to exchange intelligence like five eyes,” Brian Hughes spokesman said in e-mail.
“President Trump is clearly about all threats to our opponents on our national security and he will work with any Federal Federal or Partner who in Afghanistan, and performed in Afghanistan, and in Afghanistan, and the slaughter of innocent October.”
Board officials and some Republic MPs defend Trump’s handling of Russia as a tactic designed to perform Moscow to the negotiating table and to cross a peace contract that would end destabilizing war in Europe. Bust distrust of Russian President Vladimir Putin, the KGB veteran officer, remains high among the Allies.
Javno, the long-term Sajs USA reduced the problem. United Kingdom, the most important American intelligence partner, said there were no plans to reduce intelligent cooperation with the United States.
“The United Kingdom is the closest ally and we will continue to work closely on defense, intelligence and security issues,” said the British government spokesperson in the e-mail. “Each proposition otherwise is completely untrue.”
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service stated that it has strong relations with numerous US agencies that are “long-term and resistant.”
He added, “Canada deeply appreciates his partnership with the United States, and we believe that in the strategic interest of both countries to continue our strong national security.”
The Israeli official also praised its alliance with the United States, saying “cooperation between Israel and the United States at each level, including the exchange of key intelligence data, equally strong and strong.”
Officials from New Zealand, Australia and Saudi Arabia did not respond to comment requirements.
Some officials in federal countries, who discussed the state of anonymity for the hearing on sensitive intelligence issues, played the idea that Trump’s Russian policies would disrupt the exchange of information that the information sharing dates. They mentioned that intelligence can be divided into ways that protect sources and methods.
But some former US intelligence officers say that they are worried that Trump administration can decide to scalify intelligence collection focused on Russia, because I can no longer see Russia as an upper threat.
For example, the administration indicated that it can set a higher priority for efforts to counter the drugs from Mexico and other countries in the region. Already, the Department of Defense has arranged more resources to the southern border, including a team of analysts. And the CIA launched drone control over Mexico as part of that effort.
Trump’s decision this week for pausing intelligence assistance in Ukraine, together with military assistance, has strengthened concern among the Allies. Intelligence cooperation with Kiev – which has developed from the initial invasion of Russia in 2014. year – was used by Washington and Kiev, they say that former officials, and Ukraine provides valuable insights in Russia.
In weighing whether you choose a little intelligence sharing, five eyes – Great Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, and other American partners should take into account their risks for their own national security if cooperation with Washington has been reduced.
Cithererberizuarity Briggers
But the recent moves of the Trump Administration regarding Cyber-certainty also encouraged concerns about the management of the Management Board with Moscow.
The Secretary of the Defense of Pete Hegseth was ordered last month by American Cyber ​​commands to stop offensive cyber surgery and information against Russia, NBC news reported. It is unclear how long the order will last.
And ua Speech in UN Working Group on Cyber-Security Last month, the Senior State Department officer, Lieyl Franz, did not mention Russia as the upper cyber threat and quoted only China and Iran.
For years, including during Trump’s first terms, Republican and Democratic Administration described Russia as one of the most sophisticated and more dangerous threats to American Cybersity.
With Trump and his deputies echo some of the Russian conversational points on the war in Ukraine and to hope to expand American relations with Moscow, former intelligence officers say that the management can even share some sensitive information with Moscow.
Several former American intelligence officers said that they and their colleagues were still in power to be deeply concerned about the possible implications of the administration of the administration towards Russia, in which Moscow cannot be treated as an opponent.
“People are very worried,” said a former intelligence officer.
Covenant
The federation of five eyes is probably the most terrible covenant of spygies in the world. Intelligence cooperation among members is deeply installed, exits the IZ40. years, and officials attributed him with helping contrary to the Soviets during the Cold War and the foil of terrorist plots in recent decades.
The sharing of satellite images and eavesdropping intelligence among the members of the Alliance is extensively, highly integrated and “almost automatically,” a former intelligence officer said.
The union of the federation of the Alliance would unwrap and severe, said former officials. The police scenario could support any intelligence from human sources or analyzes that could cause friction to the White House, several former intelligence officers said.
The tail. Jason Crow, D-Colo., A member of the Intelligence Services and Armed Services, is deeply concerned from the “fast-agile drink administration” and the media reports that the American Cyber ​​command retreated to Cyber ​​surgery against Russia.
“Russia is an opponent and, as always, seek options for the sowing of discords and make problems for Americans and for the government, so that there could be every standing or withdrawal of our operations,” Crow said in an interview.
The actions of the Cyber-Security Administration encouraged speculations that Washington and Moscow may have come to an informal understanding of withdrawal from aggressive digital operations to reduce tensions and open the way for more diplomacy.
It is possible that Trump administration and Russia agreed “Cyber ​​Datentes,” Emily Harding said, a former intelligence officer. But Harding and other former intelligence officers have warned that in the past, the United States attempts to counterbalance with Russia, Kremlin proved an non-unconditional partner.
“Sounds good in theory,” Harding said, director of intelligence, national security and technological program in the Center for Strategic and International Studies a quiet tank in Washington. “I think the next question is whether you think Russia would actually hold.”
Center for Cyber ​​Crime
The main Hitch for any cyber détente with Moscow is Russia’s status as the center of cybernies that target Americans. Russia does not extradite its citizens, and a large extent refused to work with US law enforcement agencies when identifying hackers attacking American business jobs, hospitals and government networks.
It is especially worrying the Ransomware, in which hackers, often criminal gangs that speak Russian, deploy malicious software to lock a computer network and demand.
Known attacks on the American public sector often bind to Russia continuously increased each year until 2024. years, According to the research Led by Cyber-Security Company Emsisoft.
CyberSecurity Coalition Insurance found in the report Published in October to attack the cost of the world of the world on average an average of $ 603,000 on average. In some cases, the Ransware gangs allude to links to Russia’s intelligence.
Philip Reiner, General Manager of the Institute of Security and Technology, is focusing on the policy of CyberSecurity, said for NBC news that every new agreement with Russia should persuade the Kremlin who target Americans, because they rarely face legal consequences in Russia.
“Every engagement Trump administration must normalize the relationships around Cyber ​​must take into account the economic terrorism to deal with the Banda in Ransomware,” Reiner said. “It must be a factor of any overall negotiation.”
The previous American presidents of both sides tried to “reset” relations with Russia and investigated the sharing of intelligence on joint threats Moscow. After the terrorist attacks 11. September 2001. The President George W. Bush asked us spy agencies to continue the possible cooperation with Russia on the threat of terrorism. But the effort “quickly didn’t go anywhere,” said a former intelligence officer.
The Russians were not interested in sharing sensitive data on terrorist groups, according to former officials.
In OP-ED 2020. in Washington PostFormer CIA officer John Sifron and other former counterparts recounted that attempts to increase cooperation with Moscow spy services have repeatedly failed.
“Within the CIA, we were often kidding, on Putin, Win-Win means that I won you twice,” they wrote. “Good intentions from the American side have proven to be over time and re-futile in improving relations.”
2025-03-06 10:00:00
