Trump, the burning flag, begins the debate of conservative freedom of expression online star-news.press/wp

President Donald Trump’s new executive, who targets science, has acquired rare criticism from conservatives on Monday.

Executive orderAnd, which was announced on Monday, the Prosecutor is directed to prosecute violations of laws that involve the desecration of science and follow -up to litigation that would clarify the scope of the first amendment in terms of his connection with the desecration of science. In addition, the public prosecutor Bam Bondi is directed to referring issues of desecration of science that violate the governmental and local laws of the appropriate local authorities.

The matter came after months of demonstrators burning American flags in various anti -Israel demonstrations and anti -ice.

Trump faced an extraordinary reaction from the right to social media after signing the matter, as the conservatives greatly defended the burning of science as the right of the first amendment.

Trump’s flame can burn the executive order to turn the first amendment on his head with a new court

“The ban on burning science is ridiculous. It is the behavior of an anti -speech speech and snow. I will never burn the American flag because of what symbolizes me. But the act of burning it contradicts more American values ​​more than the burning itself at all,” the evolutionary biologist Colin Wright wrote.

“I will not hurt a million years for the American flag. But a president tells me that I cannot get close to one daylight on fire. I am a free American citizen. And if I ever feel that I ignited one, I will do that. This is the garbage.”

“The burning of science is little, but the government has no right to control speech or expression,” the radio host Dana Louch wrote.

“This is not actually great. While I agree with feelings, the constitutional law that has unfortunately is that burning science is the issue of freedom of expression and that the executive authority does not get crimes.”

“I do not know anything important and it is not allowed to criticize your side, but I would like to return to a time when presidents have not signed unconstitutional executive orders for the offer.”

“I do not think that the federal government should take shares of shares in companies. Protection of the first amendment applies to burning the American flag, as much as I calm this measure. Follow me to take a consistent (rare here) in the direct opposition to tribalism.”

The veterans of disgusting from the anti -Israel protests, burning the flag: “shame” for America

However, some conservatives defended the executive order, saying that the text of the matter indicates only specific positions that include burning science.

“Potus has made it clear that this is not a comprehensive ban. This is an obligation to investigate the incidents of burning science that occur in the” terrorist “context. If the flags are determined in stirring violence, the criminal ruling is issued.

“President Trump’s executive command on burning science is full of the qualifiers that attracts it from any clear meaning.” To the maximum extent, “it looks aggressive, but it means” in fact “within the limits permitted by law.”

“Well, let’s get this. I opposed Trump’s executive at the beginning, but then I read the full text … it does not criminalize the burning of the American flag. It does not violate our freedom to express.

“I am sorry, but as long as this is the current situation, I will not work in a state of hysteria about Trump’s executive order to burn the American flag,” wrote Chris Rovo, his colleague at the Manhattan Institute.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, White House spokesman Taylor Rogers said, “President Trump will not allow the American flag-a special symbol of the greatness of our country-to use it as a tool to incite violence and riots that endanger the safety of the Americans. President Trump will always protect the first amendment.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The Supreme Court ruled in the 1989 Texas case against Johnson that the burning of the American flag is a form of symbolic symbolic discourse in the first amendment. Trump’s executive, which directs the public prosecutor to “follow up the litigation to clarify the scope of the first amendment” in the world of burning science, is likely to have a coming lawsuit to challenge the ruling of 1989.

The executive order includes the argument that the Supreme Court has not “never considered the desecration of the American flag that was conducted in a way that is likely to incite an imminent procedure or that the procedure that raises” combat words is “constitutional protected”.

Trump also calls for priority to law enforcement on burning science in positions “unrelated to expression”, which include “violent crimes; hate crimes, illegal discrimination against American citizens, or other violations of the civil rights of Americans, crimes against property and peace, as well as conspiracies and attempts to violate, their pumps and ventilate these laws.

Fox News Emma Colon contributed to this report.