Passing the Great Trump Law on the Great Step in the House of Representatives, the way of paving for legislation House of Representatives star-news.press/wp

The Duwand Trump Bill for Taxes and spending has passed a procedural step in the US House of Representatives, which paves the way for the approval of possible legislation later in the day.

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, is determined to pass the bill as soon as possible, but he was frustrated by legislators – Democrats but also a handful of Republicans – who object to its provisions and total cost. Overnight, they prevented the house from agreeing to a base, which was necessary to start the discussion on this scale and the theater of its passage.

This base was recently voted at about four in the morning in Washington, DC.

Trump called for legislation, known as the only beautiful law on the law, on his office by Friday and the Day of Independence, and spent most of Wednesday in holding meetings and phone calls with skeptical Republican lawmakers.

As the rule stopped, the suspended legislators threatened, and writing on the social truth: “What are the Republicans waiting for ???

The Chamber began taking procedural votes on the bill earlier in the day, but in a sign of the challenges of the procedure, one of them remained open for more than seven hours, making it the longest vote in the history of the House of Representatives.

The Senate has already passed the bill, with Vice President, JD Vance, where a tie was made on Tuesday after a session throughout the night in which a record number of amendments was proposed.

Now the House of Representatives must approve the version approved by the Senate, which Johnson admitted, “went a little further than many of us have preferred” in its changes, especially to Medicaid, a program that provides health care for low -income Americans and disabled.

While he was heading to the floor to vote on the base, Johnson told the correspondents: “We are in a good place at the present time. This is the legislative process, and this is exactly what I think the pots are aimed at work.”

But after voting against the proposal, Keith Self, a conservative Congress member in Texas, criticized the draft law that it has failed to save enough money, curb green energy incentives or eliminate the rights of transgender people.

self Books on x: “The Senate broke the framework of the House of Representatives, then they trampled all over it. Now, the House of Representatives want to cram this broken bill under our throats by rushing to the ground while it is in the middle of the discussions, and completely ignored their promises.”

Parliament Rules Committee advanced The procedure early Wednesday morning, send it to the ground to look at it and pushed the legislators to return to the Capitol.

“I think these sounds will take a long time or longer than usual. But this is Washington. O comrades watch how the sausage is made, and so the works are operated,” said Nancy Mas, a member of Congress.

Like many other members, MACE was forced to drive from the South Carolina region to Washington after a wave of thunderstorms on Tuesday pushed a great delay in flying and canceling the capital.

Smoking Cigar, a member of Congress Troy Niels from Texas said: “There are things in the draft law that I do not like, but will I change the draft law because I did not get what I wanted? I don’t think this will be good for America.”

The House of Representatives approved a preliminary draft of the legislation in May through one vote, and to overcome opposition unanimously from the Democrats. But many financial conservatives are angry at the cost estimates that will add the Senate version more federal deficit than the plan passed at home.

The Non -Partisan Congress Budget Office estimates that the bill in its current form will add $ 3.3 million (2.4 pounds) to the US budget deficit until 2034.

The majority of the Republican majority of Johnson risks the loss of decisive voices from right -wing financial militants who are calling for discounts in severe spending, and warns against dismantling the safety network and Republican network programs from countries that Democrats are expected to take a controversial tax position. None of these groups can deviate from the draft law through a room where the Republican Party can lose more than three votes.

Trump celebrated the passage of the Senate from the draft law as “music for my ears”. The draft law was described as decisive to its second business schedule, and the Republicans in Congress made it their top priority.

The tax discounts that were enacted during the first president’s term in 2017 will expand, and include new provisions to reduce taxes on advice, additional work and interest payments for some car loans. Trump’s plans are funded for collective deportation by allocating $ 45 billion to immigration and customs detention facilities, 14 billion dollars for deportations and billions of dollars to employ 10,000 additional new agents by 2029.

It also includes more than $ 50 billion to build border fortifications, which are likely to include a wall along the border with Mexico.

To meet the demands of financial conservatives with discounts on the large federal budget deficit of the United States, the draft law imposes new work requirements on the registered in Medicaid. It also imposes an end to the use of tax states to finance their program, which may lead to discounts in services. Finally, the sunset is some incentives for the green energy technologies created by Congress during the reign of Joe Biden.

In a speech on the floor on Wednesday, Alexandria Okasio Cortez, a democracy from New York, warned: “This is the draft law is a deal with Satan. It explodes our national debt.

“For what? To give Elon Musk a tax break, billionaires, greed, with our nation. We cannot support it and will not support it. You must be ashamed.”

“Well, if beauty is in the eye of the beholder, you, Gop, have an unclear vision of what is going on around America,” said spokeswoman Emerita Nanacy Pelosi.

“Is it nice to cut food from the elderly and children? Is it nice to cut 17 million people from health care? Is it nice to do this? To give tax cuts to billionaires in our country? Is it nice to take money from education and the rest?