Why didn’t Judge Torres drop the XRP suit? The former lawyer weighs at SEC star-news.press/wp

The lengthy XRP lawsuit has taken a large turn, as many wonder why the judge has not been dropped by Analisa Torres. Amid multiple perceptions, former lawyer Mark Valge Yazan was presenting an insight into the judge’s decision -making process.
The lawyer explains the reason for Judge Torres a lawsuit against XRP
Since the XRP community is wrestling with Judge Torres’s recent decision in a lawsuit against Ripple, former SEC lawyer Mark Fall is a context of the reason not to drop the judge through the case X post.
Faljal suggested that the judge may not have fallen to the case because of her discovery that Ripple raised hundreds of millions of unregistered securities sales. According to the alleged illegal donation collection of Fagel Ripple through unregistered securities sales. Read his statement,
Perhaps because she found that Ripple illegally raised hundreds of millions of dollars from unregistered securities sales. So why do you “drop it” (whatever that)?
Recently, Judge Torres rejected the joint suggestion of Ripple and SEC in the XRP suit. After that, Ripple decreased its appeal, and an agreement to pay 50 million dollars.
There was another appropriate question that motivated the discussion on the X platform that is the potential effects of the case. The X user raised concerns about whether the lawsuit and the large resources that have been spent on it have effectively served the main SEC goals: protecting investors, maintaining fair and efficient markets, and facilitating the formation of capital. In a separate response, Vagil pointed out,
If the company does not want to comply with federal law, you should try to change it. They do not get the important laws to decide themselves.
Moreover, with regard to the silence of the judge on Ethereum, he indicated that she could only judge the case before it, which means that Ethereum was not part of a rippal suit. FAGEL also added that Judge Torres has no other role in the rippal suit, saying,
Judge Torres has no other role in this. Her ruling will be permanently, as soon as SEC votes to agree to refuse to appeal and her files with the Court of Appeal (which has not yet occurred).
How will the judge affect a judicial order on XRP sales?
Miscellaneous, Judge Torres has identified the institutional sales of XRP as a stock offer. Since this ruling remains unchanged, Ripple must stop institutional sales or compliance with the laws of securities.
In the past, Coingape reported that XRP More Morgan’s lawyer statement that Ripple was already preparing to issue a permanent judicial order about “historical institutional sales”.
In a recent tweet, Morgan has made more clarity on the repercussions of a lawsuit for XRP sales. While a member of the community argued that the issue will not affect future XRP sales, but only previous offers, Morgan said,
You realize that the exorbitant dysentery is like those that were made against Ripple aimed at curbing the current or future behavior. How can it apply to curbing the past behavior that has already happened.
<!–




–>
<!–
–>
Leave responsibility: The content and the personal views of the author and the current market conditions reflect. Please do your own research before investing in encrypted currencies, because the author and the post is responsible for any financial losses.
AD disclosure: This site may feature content with care and subsidiary links. All ads are clearly marked, and advertising partners have no effect on our editing content.
<!–
View all






–>
https://coingape.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Breaking-Judge-Torres-Denies-Ripple-And-SECs-Joint-Motion-In-XRP-Lawsuit-1.webp
2025-06-30 05:01:00




partner: