In 2019, then Harry Arter Harry Arter won his Twitter account in the center of Bournemouth. This is not particularly remarkable. The reason was somewhat noticeable. Arter said, “He said in a fair society to a Chinese party, would not be Billia.” His answers, planned, killed the opposite answers and drawn to the political discussion of Terse, many of us occasionally in social media.
When exchanging the view, Artera mentioned Jeremy Corbyn’s work leader. “He opened the Corbyn itself, he lied to investing throughout the campaign when he intended to invest in the NHS on Brexit on the day?” He asked Arterk. When he pointed slowly, Corbyn mixed his account with Prime Minister Tory Leader and Boris Johnson, he supposedly embarrassed.
It’s not about political reasons why I choose to raise this. Because it is stuck with me, despite being tempting to suggest that Harry Arter should not be considered a political consciousness of the country, it is not very far away. Simply read half-read and half “Corbyn = Bad” and “Brexit Bredit buses.
I think this type of “Mandela Effect” is becoming more common in the digital world because we are bombed with information. It processes about 20% of the information that the human brain receives every day, will take short cuts to your brain, observing models and compares to make the information easier to digest.
This often caught critical thinking (all happen to us to different sizes), the information is always not always packaged, our brains often packed before, prior to overload and useful. When we throw emotions and tomorrow in the picture, it is easy to understand the way humans interpret differently.
And that brings me to Arsenal (I promise, I promise. One of the most tedious aspects of this season has been inappropriate speech around each small thing that will happen. On Sunday in Anfield, a fans produced a measure cut from Martin Odegaard using a camera.
Club Photo Club Photo of Stuart Macfarlane’s actions about the club photographer, a year later, he produced it very well, liverpool fans held it to that measure. The fandom becomes very irrational sometimes, but I simply need to question any ecosystem that takes more than something that is something notable.
Because my fandom also makes irrational and because I have an extremely excessive brain, I became far between the perception of the public messaging of Mikel art (what I think). I don’t classify this phenomenon as a difference in interpretation (and here I have to accept the reality that can be an irrational festival), but Harry Arter style Mandela is an effect.
This week, Andres highlighted the incidence, which suggested an experienced football writer (personally I really enjoy), “but at least it is not a recognition of responsibility, which is not often heard from art or arsenal.” Again, we all come with things from our angles, with our twists, but I found an extraordinary observation.
I definitely define arteta completely and completely opposite and anyone who could read or see how the press conference could read or see for his press conference. I think this has also passed many years, in December 2020, while Arsenal was miserable and the arteta could be very justified, responsibility was responsible.
‘This is our reality right now and brave, fighting and no one should give up. It’s not time to hide – it’s time to put your face and body in line. We need to take bullets. We don’t earn football games and you need to put the chest there. Hit me, because we don’t win the right to knock me. ‘
Or when Arsenal earned a 2-1 home, July 2020. You just saw the difference between the two groups. We can’t improve in two months. That wasn’t like that. I am very proud of that. ‘
It is part of this perception, I think, probably created from two certain events, both of Sunday opponents were created against Newcastle. After the failure of the St. James, a home side was won, which is to clean about six minutes, when I took the game arteta angry, the reason why I take relatively rare events.
When the media ecosystem also occurs when events live. Saturday 12.30 and 3:00 to 1:00 pm or Sunday, at 13:30, a few shots are collected. But on Sunday, there are only 8:30 p.m., Saturday, 17:30, more than 20, when more people are in front of their TVs. If you are questionable or notable in these games, more people are watching, it’s easy.
Ange Postecoglou’s’ Da Garen Bloat “After playing a high line of Chelsea, it has been exposed to nine men in the Monday afternoon. Thanks to the art of art, I think it was reflected in my supposed management (Thomas Frank’s exception)
For Artet, I always thought of an event, usually the aggressive or passive condemnation of officials. Then, when he arrived in January in Newcastle, the edition of his response on a question in front of a question was much more twistful.
While the audience (often shameful) did not consist of public discourse, their spirit lives very in a hungry media ecosystem, we now exist and multiple active faiths make the egg. Arteta specifically asked him about the ball about the game, or twice the phrase that he used the sentence, “we need to adapt” quite deliberately airbrushed.
It is also true that we all speak poorly when managers speak pre-and-match duties in advance. Sometimes messages are aimed at fans, sometimes they are addressed to players. With Artet I think they are usually aimed at his players. Some outlets and some football ecosystems do not understand and plays a dumb engagement, they have the ability to understand some ecosystems.
There is also an imbalance between someone like me, reading or sees each press conference, and absorbs not a furious arsenal and someone absorbs and does not do it (nor do you expect it). I think that the media members need to do a little more towards the research on the way, even if a person said to read each word and try more narratives before repeating them.
I confess that I am predisposed and sympathetic to art messaging and burns me with my mischievous. But its reason I value his messaging is just Because I think it takes responsibility, it challenges to his players and himself, because it is clear that his players face a blow or victim to culture. (I wrote here deeply with many examples). I don’t think he does that, I think, I think he does, because it sees it as a way to create a mentality to win.
I often see the assumption that he refused to buy a striker (Andrew that he highlighted here) is not the case. It is clear that criticism fails to fail, but arteta could not think about what he thinks and what he wants.
I think why people don’t understand the arteta heated outside, is not a warm and blurred character or someone copying in their media ships. I’m not particularly interested in arsenal fans or not. It is one of the things I share with columnists from all the life walks I can’t leave small and irrelevant complaints.
At least I want people don’t like it based on detailed information and I hate that this is somehow important to me. This season I don’t think it’s just an imbalance in interpretation. I think he really is like Harry Arter and Jeremy Corbyn, that people are assigned or attributed things and my neurosis is my cross over me.
2025-05-15 11:00:00
