Judge Trump offer to stop the federal city funding from the Sanctuary star-news.press/wp

A Federal Judge of California, President Donald Trump promised to stop Donald Trump to stop the federal funds for various cities that play the sanctuary jurisdictions.

“2025 challenge parts Application executives and according to the conference, the Bondi Directive aimed at executive agencies attached to the Congress Agency. The Constitution violates the principles of power and separation of expenditure clause.

“They also violate the fifth amendment, as they are constitutionally vague, as the” Trump EOS EOS violates the tenth change, because the local officials impose the healthy conditions that intend to enforce immigration practice and federal law. ”

White houses and the Department of Justice did not respond immediately to the requests for comment.

Trump executive orders and a Related directive The US lawyer Pam Bondi questioned the city of San Francisco and 15 other cities and countries across the country.

Orrick blocked the similar effort in the office of his first term of office, to find his executive “constitutional” and the plaintiffs were not “unautable harm.” “We’re here again,” the judge wrote.

The Department of Justice presented the first decision in Orrick in 2017, but his authority confirmed the appeal of the appeal.

However, a federal court of appeal, however, ruled the Trump Administration in a separate outfit that may have “grants” to the city of Sanctuary.

The subject would hear the U.S. Supreme Court in 2021, but the Department of Bid’s Justice left the appeal and The matter was discarded.

The city or statues of the sanctuary are not official terms – labels that collaborate with federal immigration officials do not explicitly prevent or limit the laws.

In the case, the judge stated that the Department of Justice is early, 2025 orders and Bondi correctorals offer the guidance of executive agencies to review federal funding for sanctuary jurisdictions, and because cities do not have funds. “

“This is basically the same argument in 2017,” he wrote, while more claims appear in the new issues of the prosecution.

“The executive fear and county is stronger than in 2017,” he wrote the executive command of Trump, Bondi Directives and “Executive Agency Directive and” Executive Agencies with executive agencies like funds as funds. “

It has also begun against the jurisdictions of the sanctuaries of Government and New York, in addition to the latest statements about the higher government officials and the issues of the issues in the first Trump administration. ”

Orrik said cities and counties showed him the probability of “fatal harm.” “Threats to maintain financing causes irreparable damage to budget uncertainty, deficiency in constitutional rights, and weakening confidence between communities and communities that serve.” He wrote.